Showing posts with label Girls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Girls. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 March 2013

The Porning Of Pop Culture

"Vagina's everywhere..."



Discretion used to be the better part of TV sex scenes. Even as portrayals of love and lust got steamier, the anatomical particulars were left to the imagination, off camera or under covers. Hollywood's old visual pun, the camera panning from a couple romancing in the foreground to fireworks exploding in the background, was updated over the years. Now the precise style, duration and heat register of sexual fireworks are enacted onscreen, notes Denver Post's Joanne Ostrow, and in cable and broadcast TV dramas, the sex scenes are gymnastic...

The first evolution in TV's approach to sex involved the quantity of the sex on screen. The next evolution, the one going on now, seems to be in the manner of the sex portrayed. No position is too acrobatic, no amount of skin too graphic to depict on television. The potential awkwardness of the act seems to fascinate TV directors. It's not just television: from the popularity of E.L. James' "Fifty Shades of Grey" to the ubiquity of kink on the Internet, from a recent New York Times story on the proliferation of S&M clubs to the nightly prime-time disclaimers (TV-MA, L, S, V), the porning of pop culture is upon us.

Thank cable for ushering more graphic depictions of sex, violence and sexual violence from the World Wide Web into the living room with a wealth of literate (and award-winning) adult dramas. Depictions of sex and sexuality of every flavor are on view, not least in otherworldly settings ( Battlestar Galactica) and fantastical comedic settings (Sex and the City). True Blood and Mad Men raised the stakes. Increasingly, athleticism is the hallmark of small-screen sexual encounters. A bed is often the last place you'd find a sex scene. The unlimited varieties of the act were explored by cable, where customers pay for the privilege of seeing sadistic sexual acts (Game of Thrones), humiliating sexual encounters (Girls), bodice-ripping sex (Spartacus), paid and disabled sex (Legit), beach-chair sex (Magic City), fee-based sex play (The Client List) and more.


Meanwhile broadcast TV showcased more and younger sex, especially on shows about high schoolers played by older actors. Parenthood, Bunheads and Glee toyed with adolescent sexual exploits. The tragi-sex-com Girls on HBO brings the current state of affairs into cringe-worthy focus. This season's penultimate episode "On All Fours," as graphic as its title, explicitly referenced porn imagery in the interaction of Adam and Natalia. First they had fun sex, then they had quasi-rape sex. The dynamics of the positions, the meaning of the physical relationships, the emotions that result from the encounter are meant to be pondered on this increasingly dark post-post-feminist comedy.

Now that graphic style is edging into mainstream commercial TV. Desperate to win audiences back from cable, the broadcast networks do what they can to mimic, imply and suggest. Even a political drama about the White House sneaks off for a quickie in the computer tech closet (Scandal), as parents in the audience scramble to clear the kids from the room. The raunchiest network comedies talk endlessly about "doing it" but don't show much. Jess (Zooey Deschanel) of New Girl on Fox is not nearly as sexually exhibitionistic or self-sabotaging as Hannah (Lena Dunham) of Girls on HBO. Two and a Half Men amounts to a decade's worth of sexual innuendo but actual sex is only implied.

Here's how we know we've arrived at a newly sexualized time in mainstream America, an awkward age of transition on matters of sex: The waitress Max (Kat Dennings) on the CBS half-hour Two Broke Girls recently complained that the word "vagina" has lost its power to shock. "Vagina's everywhere," she said. Cue the leering short-order cook Oleg: "Where!?!" Clearly, the writers share Max's lament about the difficulty of getting a laugh now that the word is commonplace, but they hope for some residual shock value. Ironically, TV's reality shows are the least graphic when it comes to sexual interactions. Series like Big Brother and Jersey Shore offer bad, obnoxious and unethical behavior on display, but the sex is usually blurred, in the dark or beneath the sheets. The TV genre that purports to be most authentic and uncensored turns out to be the least revealing in sexual situations.

The easy inclusion of graphic sex scenes in TV dramas in particular has challenged writers to play with the nature of intimacy in novel ways. This creative rethinking turns out to be good for dramatic character development. The power dynamic involved in sex is now a focus beyond the physical event.

* The husband and wife power-mongers in House of Cards on NetFlix like to share a cigarette in a window late at night, their version of intimacy. We never see them in a sexual encounter with each other; that's reserved for others, their inferiors in terms of rank and power. The result is subtle: The lack of sex between the leading characters (played by Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright) makes the viewer think harder about their intriguing intimate moments, as they borrow a page from "Macbeth."

* In the superior FX drama The Americans, the very idea of sex is fraught since the couple, played by Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys, are actually an arranged covert spy team who have yet to develop a real romantic relationship. Can their work blur into a romance? Will things heat up in the bedroom while they pursue the Cold War? Meanwhile, views of Russell's character enduring demeaning, sadistic sex as a trade for information are intensely graphic. (As a lethal spy, she gets her comeuppance.)

* It's not spoiling anything to note that the only really romantic, loving expression of sex in recent TV memory occurred on ABC's Red Widow, just before the central character was widowed. Now that true love seems to be out of the way, the doors are open to more dramatic, aggressive or conflicted expressions of sex.

* FX's Bates Motel finds its starting point as a contemporary prequel to "Psycho" with a Twin Peaks vibe. The sexual tension here is novel for television: mother and son, played by Vera Farmiga and Freddie Highmore, are intertwined in unhealthy, incestuous ways. The sexual hints are subtle at first as the audience witnesses the psychological implosion of teenager Norman Bates.

We can only hope the sexual tension in that case remains more subtle than gymnastic.
Read more on this article...

Monday, 11 March 2013

Girls S02E09

"No, not on my dress!"
This week’s episode of Girls graphically depicted the results of a male character’s climax. Why the scene has outraged some, The Daily Beast's Jace Lacob explains why it’s a watershed moment for the HBO comedy...

HBO’s Girls has always been a lightning rod for critical reaction, whether it be allegations of nepotism, privilege, or racism. It’s impossible to imagine a week going by without someone, somewhere, having an adverse reaction to the Lena Dunham-created comedy. And that’s okay: art is meant to trigger emotional responses. I’d far rather watch a television show that stirred up feelings within its viewers — that challenged them to watch something complicated and often uncomfortable — than a show whose main goal was simply to please the most people, across all demographic swaths, week after week.

Girls is the most definitely the former rather than the latter. It’s a show that revels in its own complexity, in the often-unlikable natures of its characters, in the comedy of the awkward that follows. This week’s episode (On All Fours)— written by Lena Dunham and Jenni Konner and directed by Dunham — expectedly led to all sorts of responses from its viewers, many of which was of the outraged variety. Joe Flint at the Los Angeles Times yesterday penned a reaction to this week’s episode of Girls, focusing in particular on the graphic sex scene between Adam (Adam Driver) and his new girlfriend, Natalia (Shiri Appleby), which was challenging to watch: after making her crawl to his bedroom on all fours, he proceeded to engage in some disconnected, rough sex with her and then finished himself off on her chest.

This whole sex scene was some existential realness as far as Halle Kiefer is concerned, an honest depiction of the moment when someone you're sleeping with decides to act out a sexual scenario that has absolutely nothing to do with you. Despite the fact that you're the one crawling down the hallway littered with pieces of plywood and sweat-soaked towels, your partner is miles away mentally, desperate to prove something to himself or to another party not in attendance. "Not on my dress," Natalia says, cringing as Adam comes on her chest. "I really didn't like that," she informs him blankly. After apologizing for a hot second, Adam switches immediately into defensive mode. "Is this is it? Are you done with me?" he demands.


Yet Sunday's episode was "graphic even for those fans used to seeing creator and star Lena Dunham's no-holds-barred approach to story-telling," wrote Flint. "This was not a first for cable TV, or the movies. An episode of HBO's Sex and the City showed fluid but played it for laughs, as did a well-known scene featuring Cameron Diaz in the comedy There's Something About Mary. However, this time it was a jarring end to a violent and hard-to-watch scene. Even theatrical movies with sexually explicit material and adult pay-per-view channels typically steer clear of such displays, especially if it's not for comic relief."

Flint is right in saying that this was not "a first' for cable television. But he (and an HBO spokeswoman quoted in the story) seem to have a short memory, as HBO’s short-lived drama Tell Me You Love Me featured an even more graphic scene involving "fluids" that was most definitely not played for comic relief. While Tell Me You Love Me has been quickly relegated to the forgotten bargain bin of HBO dramas, the scene in question there has not and Adam "It was a prosthetic penis!" Scott has not lived down the scene in which his baby-crazed wife, played by Lost’s Sonya Walger, manually pleasures him to the point of climax. It’s not played for anything remotely related to laughs, and is instead a somber scene about how her hopes for a child are quite literally slipping through her fingers.

But putting that aside, Girls likewise doesn’t use the climax scene — and its physical memento — for comedy. It’s a clear reaction to now standardized porn aesthetics, a money shot that is both empty and valueless for both Adam and Natalia. His pleasure, at objectifying her and transforming her into a physical canvas on which to paint his physical release, is at odds with her horror at what unfolds, a moment between the two characters that is entirely depressing.

Was it difficult to watch? Yes. Was that the point? Absolutely.

Natalia’s debasement here fulfills two trajectories within the narrative. First, it pays off comments made to Hannah (Dunham) by her publisher (John Cameron Mitchell) who asks her, after reading a draft of her e-book, "Where's the sexual failure? Where's the pudgy face flecked with semen and sadness?" Here, it’s made real, a moment that combines the fluids and feelings that are lacking in Hannah’s novel

Additionally, it makes the psychological disconnect between Natalia and Adam physical. Earlier in the episode, she told Adam that she wanted him to pull out during sex and he thanked her for being so "direct," but his brusqueness works against him, as he forces Natalia into a fantasy that is clearly not her own. What worked with Hannah, what connected them — despite their dysfunction — was her willingness to go along with anything, sexually. What he realizes in his moment of climax is both that he and Hannah did connect, and that he and Natalia are over.

The semen that Adam deposits on Natalia’s chest is not meant to titillate or arouse. It’s meant to shock the viewer into opening their eyes, to see the damage that Adam perpetuates here, one based upon countless male fantasies enacted in porn. But while other cable shows might use sex and female nudity as window dressing, Girls strives for something both deeper and darker here, a revelation that there are repercussions to physical intimacy, that Natalia’s humiliation and debasement are not sexy, but painful. As I said on Twitter yesterday, "Elsewhere, it’s sanitized objectification. Here, it dares paint itself for what it is: messy."

That messiness might be rarely seen on television — or perhaps rarely seen at all, outside of the comedic — but that doesn’t make the scene any less vital or important. If anything, it serves to remind the viewer that male expectations don’t encompass the full domain of desire. However, Adam — like many of the characters in this particular episode — can’t help himself. His self-destructive behavior is no different from Hannah inserting the Q-tip into her other ear, or Marnie (Allison Williams) tragically singing her ex-boyfriend a song at his work party and then sleeping with him.

This season, all of Girls’s characters are in a state of freefall, and each is so desperate to hold on to something, or someone, that they’re willing to mess up themselves and their lovers in the process.

Television Series: Girls (S02E09)
Release Date: March 2013
Actress: Shiri Appleby
Video Clip Credit: DeepAtSea



http://uploaded.net/file/yqb3nfje
http://dfiles.eu/files/h6zf84jfk
https://hotfile.com/dl/197804433/b0f6e1d/853.zip.html
https://netload.in/datei6eeCiuplb9/853.zip.htm
http://ryushare.com/oliluj8s5l79//tmp/j ... 9a/853.zip
http://www.sendmyway.com/mw43qt987m6d/853.zip.html
http://www.putlocker.com/file/767A1BB1362FD5EC
http://uptobox.com/o7x8draq7xmv
http://www.ziddu.com/download/21779709/853.zip.html
http://ij2m9e.1fichier.com/
Read more on this article...

Sunday, 10 March 2013

Sex Scenes And TV

"Can I be the woman who screams 'I'm squirting!'?..."
Any discussion entitled "Changing Rules for Women and Sex on TV" was bound to include mentions of a certain HBO comedy series, notes Alison Willmore. Reporting in Indiewire, she states the always provocative Girls was certainly a central topic at Saturday's SXSW panel, which was moderated by ThinkProgress' Alyssa Rosenberg and populated by fellow journalists Noreen Malone (of The New Republic) and David Haglund (of Slate), as well as Sarah Shapiro, the writer/director of "Sequin Raze," a short making its world premiere at the festival, and Anna Camp (The Mindy Project, True Blood), the film's lead. The group dug into Lena Dunham's young career and the portrayals of sex, relationships and nudity in her show, along with the power dynamics of the intimacies of House of Cards and what constitutes a good sex scene. While the panel covered a lot of interesting ground, some familiar to anyone who follows the work of the writers on it, the most interesting viewpoint may have been that of Camp, who as an actor has participated in her fair share of sex scenes and who has to navigate them as part of potential roles.

Camp spoke about scenes in Mad Men ("I feel like competing to prove myself worthy of him sexually," she said of the blow job her character Bethany Van Nuys gave Don Draper in a cab) and in House of Lies (she auditioned for the role that ultimately went to Kristen Bell, leading her to ask if instead "Can I be the woman who screams 'I'm squirting!'?"). Actors have to give their trust to the directors, writers and producers in charge of the project, which she noted can be frustrating or frightening. "I want to be picky for when I do that," she said of sex scenes, noting that many of them were just the "same male fantasy" and that it was often taken for granted in films and TV that attractive characters would have great sex, but that she was interested in getting beyond the usual depictions.


The scenes that dominated the conversation included Dunham's several with Patrick Wilson in that much-debated recent episode of Girls (he was an "idealized male figure instead of an idealized female figure," noted Haglund, who was actually not a fan of the installment); and the Melissa Leo segment from the past season of Louie thanks to his depiction of sex and desire, particularly a scene that treads the line between consensual interaction and forced reciprocation. Camp cited as noteworthy the scene in Mad Men involving Jessica Paré's Megan Draper and the white carpet. Shapiro brought up the scene in the pilot of Girls in which Hannah (Dunham) refuses Adam (Adam Driver) when he goes off to get lube ("to be grounded in your own body enough to say 'I don't want that'" was striking to her).

Cable is, for obvious reason, the home for most of the shows that were discussed, but the freedom to be explicit wasn't always, for the panelists, a good thing. Haglund spoke of how quickly Homeland managed to show a nude Morena Baccarin, saying that the cable-style rush to that made him distrust the series at times, Malone noted that it's often the lead-up to sex that's more interesting ("I want a good buildup") and Shapiro said that for her, "the sexiest thing in the world is the closed door."

Network TV has generated discussions of its own in how it's dealt with one of the consequences of sex -- pregnancy, including how some characters have dealt with fertility crises. Rosenberg pointed out Robin Scherbatsky's (Cobie Smulders) learning that she can't have children in the past season of How I Met Your Mother and Cece's (Hannah Simone) finding that she only has a limited window in which to conceive on New Girl. Watching the latter development, Malone said that at first "I was angry that one of my favorite TV shows was inciting this personal panic in me," but then realized that it was a natural part of the conversation. As these characters approach or begin their 30s, it's something they would think about, because "sex is not divorced from childbirth." It may not be as audacious as Hannah Horvath's hookups, but shows "would be leaving rich territory unexplored if they didn't" go there.

Writing in The Horn, Emily Kausalik agreed that one of the most contested and fascinating developments in television over the past few years has been the changing scope of female representation and sex on TV, but admitted disappointment that this very frank dialogue about shows challenging age old questions of double standards and female desire existed entirely within the male/female, heterosexual binary and didn't explore same-sex and LGBTQ relationships and desires. Though that may be a telling reflection on American television in general.
Read more on this article...

Monday, 11 February 2013

Girls S02E05

In Hollywood, it seems you’re only allowed to be naked if you’re Megan Fox. If you’re not, you had better be apologetic about it, like Melissa McCarthy in Mike & Molly. But God forbid you’re a woman with an unconventionally beautiful body and you’re okay with it, writes Salon's Soraya Roberts... That’s when people like Howard Stern start to get hysterical: Lena Dunham, whom the radio host described as a "little fat girl who kind of looks like Jonah Hill" and likened her taking off her clothes to rape, has become a feminist heroine largely due to the fact that she unapologetically parades her naked body across the TV screen. Dunham has been both derided and deified for baring her unconventionally beautiful figure throughout both seasons of her HBO series. (And don’t expect her to stop anytime soon, she told Entertainment Weekly in a February cover story: "My point with getting naked is never proven.") And through her performance, she has established a new body ideal. Carolee Schneemann, the feminist artist who originated nude performance art in the ’60s and was dubbed "body beautiful" for her stunning figure, believes Dunham does more than add a dose of reality to the "deformations" – "the swollen puffed up lips, the emaciated shapes, the huge inflated boobs" – that populate Tinseltown. "There’s nothing deformed about Dunham," she said. "She’s the ideal of normal."

Five decades after female artists first started exposing their bodies in public, Dunham has absorbed this feminist art tradition and dragged it into the realm of the mainstream. In the second season premiere of Girls earlier this month, the 26-year-old actress, writer and director’s body took center stage three times in a space of 30 minutes: once before the credits as her character Hannah Horvath bounced on top of her boyfriend, once when she changed her dress in front of a friend and once in the closing scene when Hannah stripped off to reveal her thong to the camera. Though only four other episodes have aired since then, Dunham has appeared naked, in some form, in all but one. In the third episode, Hannah gets high on coke and trades tops with her dance partner, who, unfortunately, is rocking a yellow mesh shirt. Hannah removes her top in the middle of the dance floor to reveal her naked chest, which is barely covered by the Day-Glo fishnet she proceeds to wear through a Metro Drugs. "I usually hate when you wear your nipples out in public like that," says her gay ex, Elijah, mid-snort. "But you look so beautiful right now."


The second series’ surge in flesh sparked a parallel surge in press that had been brewing since the first season. In December, Hello Giggles had already published an article entitled 'Why Lena Dunham’s Body Matters (and Why It’s Ridiculous That It Does)' only to be eclipsed by the show’s racial anemia. But now that season two has kicked off with a black cast member, "it’s time to properly freak out about Lena Dunham’s body," as the Daily Beast puts it. New York Post TV critic Linda Stasi called first dibs on the wunderkind for having "giant thighs, a sloppy backside and small breasts," while Stern added, "I don’t want to see that."

"People are saying, 'How dare she show her body? She doesn’t have the perfect body!'" said Danielle Knafo, author of the 2009 book 'In Her Own Image: Women’s Self-Representation in 20th Century Art.' "But in the ’60s, the women with the perfect bodies were showing their bodies, and they were accused of the same thing." Before Schneemann lay naked in her 1963 installation 'Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions,' female artists kept their own nudity out of their work. "It was private, it wasn’t part of any explicit cultural discussion except as pornography or science," Schneemann said. "The taboo about penetration and moisture and intercourse, really that overrode any other aesthetic conversation." She started including herself in her own 'body collages' in response to the "constrained realm" in which female artists lived. "I thought that was suppressive and an artifice and it didn’t respond to the way I experience my own life," she said. "I thought I could work differently."

Man, did she ever. In her controversial 1967 film 'Fuses,' which won the Cannes Film Festival Special Jury Selection prize a year later, Schneemann recorded herself having sex with her boyfriend then manipulated the celluloid – staining, painting and re-editing and mixing the images with nature photographs. In so doing, she revealed how a woman’s depiction of her own sex act differed from a man’s. Despite stating in her 1976 book, titled 'Cezanne, She Was a Great Painter,' that her work was intended to make "a gift of my body to other women," Schneemann was promptly labeled a narcissist and an exhibitionist. It was a criticism largely reserved for women, claimed renowned feminist art critic Lucy R. Lippard in her seminal 1976 essay 'The Pains and Pleasures of Rebirth: European and American Women’s Body Art.'



"A woman using her own face and body has a right to do what she will with them, but it is a subtle abyss that separates men’s use of women for sexual titillation from women’s use of women to expose that insult," she wrote, adding, "Men can use beautiful, sexy women as neutral objects or surfaces, but when women use their own faces and bodies, they are immediately accused of narcissism."

Though Lippard allowed that there is an element of exhibitionism in body art – "perhaps a legitimate result of the choice between exploiting oneself or someone else" – she refused to accept that artists like Schneemann were vain. To illustrate her point, she used male performance artist Vito Acconci, whose 1971 work 'Seedbed' had him lying underneath a gallery ramp masturbating and fantasizing about the visitors above. "Because women are considered sex objects, it is taken for granted that a woman who presents her nude body in public is doing so because she thinks she is beautiful," Lippard wrote. "She is a narcissist, and Acconci, with his less romantic image and pimply back, is an artist."

While Schneemann was exposing her unblemished back on the East Coast, Judy Chicago promoted performance art on the West Coast. By the 1970s, Chicago had reportedly coined the term 'Feminist Art' prior to launching the Fresno Feminist Art Program, the first of its kind in the U.S. There, she used performance as part of a "consciousness raising objective," according to Jayne Wark, author of 2006′s 'Radical Gestures: Feminist Performance Art in North America.' Like Schneemann, Chicago employed the medium to break women out of their established position in society. "I discovered – long before feminist theory – that my young female students all knew how to ‘perform’ femininity, and I helped them translate those abilities into performances," Chicago said via e-mail, "including 'The Cock and Cunt Play,' which I wrote and used to help the students deal with their limitations because the 'female role' (as we called it then) interfered with their abilities to grow as artists."

Throughout the ’70s, performance art began to proliferate ("Women often flock to new creative areas because there are not the same institutional barriers," said Chicago), with conventionally beautiful women like Schneemann at the helm. According to Knafo, pretty performers would use their looks to "question the person with the gaze." In Hannah Wilke’s 1979 work 'So Help Me Hannah: What Does This Represent/What Do You Represent (Reinhart), 1978–1984,' for example, the artist sat in a corner lost in thought, naked, her legs spread. "It would ordinarily be a pornographic image but it’s not because she’s got her hand on her head and she’s thinking, so you see her as a thinking woman, not just as a sexual object," Wark explained.

Though body image seemed to be less of a concern 40 years ago, Schneemann said "the same over-idealizations inhabited women’s sense of how they should be or could be," and some of that bubbled up to the surface of their performance pieces. In 'Carving: A Traditional Sculpture' (1972), Eleanor Antin recorded herself losing 10 pounds over 37 days, playing with the idea of Greek sculptors carving at marble to create ideal forms. Two years later, Canadian artist Lisa Steele blurred the gender lines when she filmed close up images of her various disembodied imperfections in the video 'Birthday Suit — with Scars and Defects.' Though Chicago admits that anorexia and bulimia weren’t yet major issues during this time, she recalls a film in Fresno by one female artist that showed "a very large, naked woman getting into a bathtub and caressing herself."

Chicago blames the 'white male canon' for the fact that, 40 years later, Dunham’s normal naked body is still considered 'shocking.' "When I created 'The Dinner Party,' I believed that I would be able to break the cycle of erasure that it recounts in which century after century, women do not know what women before them thought, taught or created," she said. "Now I understand that we are still IN that cycle largely because the mainstream institutions (universities and museums) perpetuate a male-centered curriculum and art in which women are ‘added on.’"

But Dunham is breaking the cycle in one institution at least: Hollywood. The self-styled feminist knows about Chicago’s work, even if precious few others in Tinseltown do. Last April, in response to L Magazine’s question of who she would invite "living or dead" to her fantasy dinner party, Dunham listed off everyone from Katharine Hepburn to Tavi Gevinson and said they would all be eating "on plates designed by Judy Chicago." And while still a student at Oberlin College, Dunham appeared to give Chicago another nod with her 2008 performance piece 'The Fountain,' which she uploaded to YouTube. According to the New Yorker, the video (which was removed after garnering 1.5 million hits) showed the 21-year-old student breaking the rules by stripping down to a bikini and performing her ablutions in the campus fountain. Dunham’s work reminded Wark of Chicago’s 1972 performance piece 'Ablutions,' a meditation on rape that included a tub in which women were "bathed."

Over the years, Dunham continued (and continues) to include the art world in various forms in her work. In her first series, the 2009 web show 'Delusional Downtown Divas,' which was made for the art magazine Index and includes a cameo by ’60s performance artist Joan Jonas, three pretentious New Yorkers attempt to cash in on their 15 minutes in the local art scene. And in her subsequent indie meta-feature 'Tiny Furniture,' Dunham’s college-grad alter ego moves back in with her artist mother (played by the director’s own mom, photographer Laurie Simmons). Then there’s Marnie, the wannabe curator in Girls who realizes in the second season that she may already be a dinosaur.

For better or worse, Dunham was weaned on art. Her mother is a photographer who creates domestic miniatures with dolls, and her dad, Carroll Dunham, creates paintings "inhabited by rectangular shapes sprouting male genitals," according to the New Yorker. In an interview with Baltimore City Paper in 2011, Lena admitted that, on top of the semi-autobiographical subject matter of 'Tiny Furniture,' her mother’s photographs inspired the film’s minimalist aesthetic. And despite her father’s refusal to appear in her projects, Lena described his work as having "kind of an interesting body-sexuality thing to it that I think I found sort of liberating and inspiring."

Knafo, a psychoanalyst as well as an art historian, believes Lena’s parents may be the key to why she uses her own body in her work. "Sexuality, dolls, these are things she grew up with, and where did that leave her relationship to her own body? Her own body that is overweight for our culture?" she asked. "Her putting herself out there naked over and over again is in a way saying, 'Look at me, I’m OK.'" To her credit, Lena basically said the same thing in a New Yorker profile that called her nudity "a pre-emptive strike against disparagement." "I live in this constant state of 'This is what I look like — fuck you!'" she said, "and being, like, 'I am so sorry, I want to cover myself up.'" In an interview in the Hollywood Reporter earlier this month, she added that her penchant for nudity "does not come from a place of confidence and is a compulsion."

Regardless of the psychological motivation behind taking her clothes off, Lena’s nudity is having a positive affect on American society’s psyche. "Lena Dunham is in a way desensitizing the culture by showing her naked body," Knafo said. "All the reactions to it show all the prejudices that people have about what kind of female body is fit to be seen in the public." Feminist icon Gloria Steinem told New York magazine’s Vulture blog of the HBO show earlier this week, "I am so relieved to see real people saying real words."

It’s about time, considering that bodies like Lena’s were even less welcome in the arts 50 years ago, according to Schneemann. "When I used my naked body, if it hadn’t been ideal, I couldn’t have made any inroads into perceptual consciousness — I would simply have been laughed off," she said. "But my body was able to confuse the issues because it worked as a double agent: It was conventionally attractive, it could receive attention, and then, what it was doing in terms of my own creative imaging was subverting expectations."

Lena’s goals are not so lofty. She claimed in an interview with artist Miranda July in this month’s Interview magazine that she was thankful that, in the ’70s, her mother and other artists of the Picture Generation, such as Louise Lawler and Cindy Sherman, "were trooping around and stuffing their photos in everyone’s faces and saying it was OK to have a show that wasn’t about big theoretical ideas about math and structure and theory." Lena is a master at the art of simplicity. While Sherman continues to put on masks, Dunham removes them, both literally and figuratively. "It’s very matter-of-fact — and that’s one of the reasons it has made an impact," XO Jane editor Jane Pratt told Salon earlier this month of Lena’s nudity. "It’s not like she’s trying to make a statement." While feminist artists questioned the gaze with their beautiful bodies, she uses her normal body to ignore it. "What Girls says is 'Fuck the gaze,'" wrote Ta-Nehisi Coates in the Atlantic. "Lena Dunham ain’t really performing for you."

Which is not to say she isn’t performing. Lena is a savvy writer and director who is deliberate in her choices, including when she takes her clothes off and what parts of her body she reveals. And just like her '60s foremothers, her nude performance is less about art and more about raising awareness. As Steinem explained to Vulture, "The more rebellious we become politically and economically in our lives, the more society tries to tell us that there’s something wrong with us," including our bodies. Girls helps bring us back to normal. "The fact that Hannah exists on TV and is not a size 4 is meaningful," Lena told UK Metro this year, adding to the New York Times, "I have a body that is outside of the Hollywood norm, and it’s not the kind of body I ever thought would be seen naked on television."

Television Series: Girls (S02E05)
Release Date: February 2013
Actress: Lena Dunham
Video Clip Credit: DeepAtSea



http://dfiles.eu/files/ttwdiz9uq
https://hotfile.com/dl/193845021/8b8e865/784.zip.html
http://www65.zippyshare.com/v/38050855/file.html
http://www.putlocker.com/file/6A8A0D7AE1961E29
http://www.sendmyway.com/s6aoglku62c7/784.zip.html
https://netload.in/dateiFX0pO6d3LK/784.zip.htm
http://www.ziddu.com/download/21561226/784.zip.html
http://www.sharebeast.com/34ymkdia4v8f
Read more on this article...

Sunday, 3 February 2013

Girls S02E04

Last season on Girls, Marnie, the uptight, beautiful one played by Allison William, was so turned on by her flirtatious encounter with a hugely self-confident cad and artist named Booth Jonathan (Jorma Taccone) that she had to run into a bathroom for an emergency masturbation session. On last week's episode, Booth Jonathan appeared again, whisking Marnie to his apartment in Bushwick where he showed her his "Toad the Wet Sprocket"-influenced artwork and the two had doll-witnessed sex, aptly described by Taccone as being in the "starfish position." Williams spoke with the Salon's Willa Paskin about what Marnie sees in Booth and the improvised parts of the sex scene...

Talk to me about the sex scene with Booth Jonathan.

That sex scene makes me laugh so hard. We laughed throughout filming it. That freaking doll. The set direction on our show is just so brilliant every day, and that was really at this amazing apartment in Bushwick, which is funny because Marnie vowed she never came to Bushwick and she did very readily. But walking into that bedroom and seeing that dummy standing in the corner, all of us had the same reaction, we were like, "She’s gotta be right here. She’s gotta be in the sex with us." So as a result, the entire scene was just pure laughter.

So "Look at the doll," that wasn’t in the script?

It was not in the script. We get influenced by the set constantly – set, costumes, surroundings, whatever – and we saw that thing and we were, like, "Oh, for sure it’s got to be in the scene. Absolutely, she needs to have something to say about that in that scene." So that was all improvised.


Booth is surprisingly bad at sex for someone who is so confident that he’s not.

That just makes him more colourful in my book.

When Marnie laughs at him, what is going on?

She’s laughing at the fact that it happened. I don’t think it’s occurred to her that he’s bad at sex. I think she’s just shocked that it happened with Booth Jonathan. And she’s star-struck. I mean, his house, and this is happening, it’s just crazy. And she’s in a lot of denial about him, down to the fact that when she emerges from that chamber with his art project, she tells herself and him that it’s brilliant, even though there’s no way, if she sat down at an exam at school, there’s no way she’d be able come up with anything interesting to say about it. But that’s the whole idea: that he’s more hype than he is real, and it’s interesting to watch that play out.

Were you actually listening to Duncan Sheik in that scene?

Not when we shot it, no. But the sound of televisions is very creepy, as it turns out. And it’s kind of deafening, and it’s on a frequency that you’re like, "I shouldn’t be listening to this. I’m never gonna be able to hear anything anymore." And also the video, there was one of something rotting, there were maggots, it was very, very bizarre. It was dusty and that was really fun too, to be like, "Marnie doesn’t want to get dusty on his floor."

Television Series: Girls (S02E04)
Release Date: January 2013
Actress: Jemima Kirke & Lena Dunham
Video Clip Credit: DeepAtSea



http://dfiles.eu/files/ot9co22mt
https://hotfile.com/dl/192257177/692003e/772.zip.html
http://www.sendmyway.com/yx9uoko57ejv/772.zip.html
http://www.putlocker.com/file/53E0D6B772615DA7
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/82672656/file.html
http://ge.tt/8UtqmIX
http://www.ziddu.com/download/21496302/772.zip.html
Read more on this article...

Monday, 28 January 2013

Girls S02E03

Howard Stern is now in full support of Lena Dunham and her nudity on Girls, but he'd like to know when why her hot co-star Allison Williams has yet to strip down. Williams plays the sexually repressed character Marnie on the critically acclaimed (and now Golden Globe winning) HBO comedy series. She is also the daughter of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams. Howard Stern says he suspects that the well-respected news anchor has had a hand in his daughter keeping covered up on camera.

Stern grilled Dunham on last Wednesday's satellite radio broadcast for details on whether Williams will ever strip down for Girls. "My character is the one sort of having the most sort of sexual pratfalls, if you will," said Dunham. "But also it runs really counter to my nature - I think people who want to be nude should be nude. I don’t want to be like a 57-year-old creepy man producer and pressure anyone into it...[Williams] plays a character who’s super closed to her own sexuality, so she’s not really playing somebody who’s supposed to be running through the streets with no bra on. We’re all doing our jobs... You never know what the future of the show will hold, but Allison is — I would say she is less excited about wielding those parts of herself than I am, but you know, she’s really open to the sexual content of the show."


Stern says he suspects that Brian Williams would step in and protest if Dunham ever asked his daughter to go nude. "Don’t you think Brian Williams her dad is going to be like: 'Listen honey, I’m the anchorman. I’m with NBC I’ve got a heavy job here. No way you’re showing your boobs on camera'?" asked Stern. "I haven’t delved into the intricacies of their relationship. I have a dad who paints large pictures of penises. So that’s my experience."

This week, Williams herself went on Chelsea Lately and took the opportunity to explain what it is like to watch her racier scenes in the company of not only her illustrious father but also the rest of her family. When asked about the collective reaction, Williams joked there is "vomiting in their chairs" before going on to disclose that she gets her family through those scenes by preparing them in advance for what's about to come, and taking them through the scenes in a very technical way to minimize the weirdness. "I've seen every sex scene I've ever done on this show with my whole family," said Williams. "It's totally fine. I warn them beforehand. I say, listen, this is the scene, here are the positions, this is the way it's shot..."

Even her grandmother is a fan, although that wasn’t always the case. "She watched the first episode and she was like, 'This is feminism?' And then by the end of the season she was like, 'This is feminism.' The tone changed completely. She was really psyched about it," said Williams. "In the first season there's a break-up scene where I break up with someone while we're having sex. So I say I'm on top of him, I'm straddling him, I have just a bra on, the dress is going to fall down... and they're standing there saying 'okaaay, okaaay' and then we watch it and the reaction is always the same... it's not as bad as you thought it was going to be!"

Television Series: Girls (S02E03)
Release Date: January 2013
Actress: Lena Dunham & Allison Williams
Video Clip Credit: DeepAtSea



http://dfiles.eu/files/hfqnnvhlc
https://hotfile.com/dl/191042196/5748ca3/750.zip.html
http://www.putlocker.com/file/A3E5D9D11FC22CEF
http://www.sendmyway.com/9qro4q4del7i/750.zip.html
https://netload.in/datei4mgpi7QRZP/750.zip.htm
http://ge.tt/6gTyPgW
http://www.2shared.com/file/Srwd_eup/750.html
http://www.ziddu.com/download/21448202/750.zip.html
http://www.gamefront.com/files/22893110/750.zip
Read more on this article...

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Reclaiming The Body On Camera

Hannah Horvath’s constant nudity in Girls has been a point of discussion since the start of the first season; one of the reasons Girls has been successful has to do with the way it tackles our own attitudes regarding female overexposure. Recently, Howard Stern caused a minor stir when he called Dunham "a little fat chick' and likened her sex scenes to "rape." Throughout the media, Lena Dunham is both heralded and criticized for filming her own naked body, in all its soft, unphotoshopped glory. In many ways, despite how ubiquitous it has become, female nudity on screen is directly linked to shame, argues Arielle Bernstein. It doesn’t matter what we look like. The most beautiful women in the world are subjected to criticism of their bodies, as well as their sexuality, when they take off their clothes.

The female body in photographs and film is still, at some level, considered to be public property, something that is intended to provoke, entertain, inspire or arouse the audience. We don’t often see women having agency over their own bodies and, indeed, much of the focus surrounding Dunham’s nudity has been on her insistence on placing her characters in a range of strange, unfulfilling, and sometimes humiliating sexual situations. But the scene Bernstein loves most in Girls is the one of Hannah naked and happy, eating cupcakes in a bathtub. This simple image is strangely radical: a private moment where we see a woman enjoying her body just as it is, a naked woman who exists for no one else.


In many ways, 2012 has been the year of the female confession; great media attention has been given to women who are willing to tell all, unequivocally, all the time. We see this in the rise of female reality TV stars who share everything, ranging from their diet tips to their sex lives. We see this, also, in the burst of female success that has come from baring all, confessing painful past histories that include incest, eating disorders, drug use, depression, sexual liaisons, and all sorts and staples of traditionally "bad" female behavior. Perhaps there is nothing new about our constant and unwavering fascination with good girls gone bad, with hearing female sexual confessions, especially those that bear the marks of humiliation or risk. What is new is the attitude that confession, in all its messy and strange incarnations, will give women a true voice by highlighting the person behind the feminine façade, the creature who can see the outer objectified self with painful precision.

In many ways, talking about the sex on Girls leaves us in a double bind. On the one hand it makes sense to praise Dunham’s tenacity, her willingness to be nude on camera despite her "imperfections," her determination to put her own experiences on public view for the sake of her art. On the other, it is arguable that the attention surrounding Girls is born from a kind of sensationalism that male artists, writers, and directors never have to struggle with. No one looks at Boogie Nights and considers the extent to which Paul Thomas Anderson’s own sense of sexuality helped influence his film. We assume that male auteurs are able to separate themselves from their projects in the same way that we assume the deep male voiceover, which is a mainstay in so many feature films, is the voice of "God," omnipotent and all-knowing. Kanye West and any number of male recording artists can describe their sexual preferences and predilections, while artists like Rihanna are consistently stigmatized for doing the same.

Sometimes, as in the case of Rihanna, we conceptualize our tongue clucking as if it were borne out of concern, but the reality is a bit more sinister than that. Film, in particular, has a legacy of overt objectification of women; it is impossible to watch the camera linger on Hannah Horvath’s body, in any number of scenes in Girls, without considering the extent to which female bodies are looked at and the extent to which we still imbue the female body with meaning. The literary female confessor is still in some ways hidden — there is a separation between page and person. In her book, 'How Should a Person Be?', Sheila Heti can describe sexual situations and fantasies without provoking the same exact combination of excitement and ire that erupts when a female artist produces nude photographs to go alongside an artistic project. When Miranda July and Lena Dunham get naked on camera, the audience is often more obsessed with what this propensity for nudity says about them as individuals than with its contribution to their art.

While self-exposure is often intended to expose the male gaze, to illustrate how there is no blank slate that we can cast desire onto, that there is something unique and fundamentally human about being a woman and being a girl, exposure is not, in reality, always an empowered act. Nakedness, of course, can be freeing, but only if we are fully in charge of when, where, and how we are taking off our clothes. We are used to seeing young girls coerced into taking their clothes off for other people, whether in the fashion industry or in any number of films and music videos. Indeed, for many women in literature, film, and the arts, nakedness is the price we pay for attention and acclaim; for many, nakedness is the only pale shadow of acclaim we may ever really get. The female artist or writer who chooses to get naked is always seen as a naked woman first and as an artist second. The image of the naked woman, regardless of how SHE is using that image, is read into the fabric of our culture as an object we can pick apart, distribute, decimate, worship, or destroy.

The dialogue surrounding Lena Dunham’s naked body illustrates the ways that disentangling one’s self from one’s own history is still a struggle for the female artist, one for which there isn’t a single answer. The obsession with female confession is about the shapes and shades of female sadness, the ways the female body has betrayed us, the fear that our still strangely misogynistic culture has broken our collective hearts. Fifty Shades of Grey is marketable because the text ruptures nothing sacred in our culture; women are allowed to be sexual as long as they are an empty vessel waiting to be filled. We still view the connection between female sexuality and individual agency as incredibly tenuous.

Perhaps this is why, in many ways, Bernstein yearns for the partial exposure of the femme fatale to the overexposure of the ingénue. While the camera lingers on the body of vamps and vixens, their façade still seems one of power, rather than powerlessness. The femme fatale, unlike other kinds of sex bombs, is dangerous not because she is desirable, but because she has secrets. Her desires are wild and untamed, and her motives are private and unclear. The femme fatale is threatening because she is a free agent who operates according to her own moral code. Not giggly and coy like a Marilyn, not bouncy and bold like a Britney, not regal or refined like Grace Kelly, the femme fatale is blood and ice and grit. She is a hot throb of sex, naked but never exposed. Her drive is insatiable. She gives away nothing. She takes and takes and takes.

Bernstein has felt drawn to these types of female characters since she was a little girl. The minute she saw Jessica Rabbit walk onstage in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?", all slinky red dress and deep-throated whisper, she thought, "This is what it means to be a woman." Since then she's loved every femme fatale she's seen on screen. Marlene Dietrich. Greta Garbo. Barbara Stanwyck. Rita Hayworth. Lauren Bacall. Sharon Stone. Angelina Jolie. Dangerous, powerful, sexual women.

In contrast, scenes of women exposed horrify and saddens her. She can’t watch Hannah Horvath lean over the couch and get told to "play the quiet game" while her obnoxious boyfriend may or may not be unwrapping a condom in preparation for anal sex without getting incredibly upset. The modern woman on film has been presented as a warrior (Katniss from The Hunger Games, The Bride from Kill Bill) or an ingénue (Bella from Twilight, any number of romantic comedies which fail the Bechdel test time and time again). Neither of these presentations of femininity gets us any closer to true personhood. Perhaps this is why her love for the femme fatale figure remains: if her only choice is to be a symbol then let her keep her secrets rather than confess them all away. Let her be fire and ice and blood.

The qualities Bernstein admires most about Lena Dunham are the ways in which she is pure steel. She loves how she refuses to capitulate to the criticisms leveraged against her body, even though she feels this focus detracts from other important aspects of the show. Our fixation on female bodies highlights just how much we still need to be shocked into paying attention to young women’s wants and needs. Many times the bodies we are presented with are static—photo spreads, billboards, scenes of women posing, rather than actually doing anything purposeful at all. Images that illustrate the female body in motion, whether it's Jessica Rabbit sauntering on stage, or Hannah Horvath dancing around her room, are empowering precisely because they are about claiming ownership over one’s own body, about not being a metaphor or symbol or fantasy for anyone else. They are about being a person in the world.
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Sex Trope #2- Hand Or Object Underwear

"I could never be a gay man. I hate blow jobs and anal sex. I assume I hate anal sex..."

Last night saw a new inductee into the infamous television sex trope club that is 'Hand or Object Underwear'; ie, when a person inexplicably covers up their nudity using their hands, arms, hair or an inaminate object. Unlike 'Scenery Censor', this is intentional on their part and can be done with men or women and can be (though not neccessarily) related to 'Sex for Product', 'Public Exposure', 'Naked People Are Funny', 'Godiva Hair' and 'Improvised Clothes'. Among photographers the breast version is sometimes known as the "arm bra."


The offending moment occurred in the season two opener of HBO's Girls and, as such, involved one of the most awkward sex scenes ever to feature on a mainstream cable show; a coupling that had at least one reviewer yelling at her set: "He's gay! What is he doing? What is she doing? This is just weird!" The first time we are invited to question how committed to being gay Elijah (Andrew Rannells) is came right in the opening scene. There he was, now Hannah's (Lena Dunham) roommate because Marni (Allison Williams) moved out, spooning Hannah who you recall is his ex. The guy that gave her HPV. He's got morning wood but says it's not for her. Later, we meet Elijah's older and slimy boyfriend George at the big party the new roomies throw at their apartment and we realize why Hannah's gay ex proceeds to get so drunk he ends up ass in the air and getting it on with Marni on the couch after singing some Sarah McLachlan jams together. This right after Marni confesses she could never be a gay man because she doesn't like oral and never had anal. Apparently that's sexy talk. No one's around at the time - party had long been over. They kiss. She slaps him. They kiss again. She pushes him. Next thing you know he's naked, she's covering up her boobs because, you know, she's Brian Williams' daughter, and he gets a condom. A few thrusts later, he loses his erection; he accuses her of rolling her eyes and they're done.

Williams and Rannells later spoke with HuffPost TV about the latest twist in Elijah and Marnie's complicated relationship, which progressed from him bitch-slapping her in Season 1 to that impulsive attempt at sex that ultimately fell flat. "I'd never done a nude scene before. I'd never done a sex scene before. So the idea that you were gonna have a bad sex scene, where you also had to sort of fluff yourself, I was like, 'How the fuck?'" Rannells said. "Allison was my first, and she could not have been nicer about it ... She made me very relaxed." Williams said she could relate to Rannells' "first time" sex scene concerns. "There's a lot to take in. You don't know what the details of it are going to be. How many people are around? What is it going to feel like and look like?" she remembered. "Once you know that drill, it becomes like ... 'Oh, Thursday, I have to be naked next to someone I'm not dating' ... You learn that it's just being light about it ... Once you realize that, it immediately liberates you ... and that also helps the performances too."


Williams' own comfort level with such scenes has increeased since Season 1. Filming the scene with Rannells was "so funny to shoot," she said. "There's only one way to get through those scenes, and it's laughter - that's it. No amount of logistics and nude coverings and number of crew members, nothing can affect it other than sense of humor." She added that it also helped that they "borrowed lotion from my makeup guys, so we both smelled like a piece of cake." While shooting the scene, Rannells was looking out for Williams, who has gotten through several Girls sex scenes while eschewing Dunham-levels of nudity. "I think I properly protected her nakedness," he recalled. "I mean, I was also trying to cover my penis. It's like really degrading - you wear a cock-sock and you just tie it around yourself and it's pretty humiliating; although then I became wildly comfortable with it at a certain point. I was just like standing around. I remember Lena saying to me at one point, 'Do you want to put on pants?' And I was like, 'Oh, yeah, yeah, of course.'"

In stark contrast to Dunham's in-your-face nudity, there are three explanations as to why William's sex scene played out as chaste and unrealistic as it did; ie, it was a character choice, an actress choice or an editorial decision. As a character Marnie is uptight, critical and regularly complimented for her beauty on the show. She is, essentially, Hannah's opposite both in body type and body visibility. In the premiere of season one, Marnie and Hannah sit in a bathtub. Dunham’s arms drape over the side of the tub while Williams sits upright, tightly wrapped in a towel. "I only show my boobs to people I’m having sex with," Marnie says at the time. Even before we got to last night's debacle the audience already knows this to be untrue having sat through numerous bizarre nipple-less onscreen sex scenes throughout the first season.

The second option, that what we're seeing here - or rather, aren't - is just evidence of a strict no-nudity clause in Allison Williams' contract does carry more credence. Speaking in GQ magazine in April last year she made it clear she would prefer to avoid Dunham style clothes shedding... "unless there's a brisk breeze or something, I tend to keep them on." When asked directly in the Vulture that same month, if she would be getting naked on the show, Williams replied she was not 'planning on it' and insisted she could talk about her contractual stipulation in that regard. By June, in conversation with Fashion magazine, Williams clarified the situation a little further. "Right now, I don’t see myself ever doing nude scenes," she said. "Once you do them, you can’t take it back because of the way Google Images works. I also think that unfortunately nudity seems to overshadow some of the more brilliant things that are going on." In the unlikely event that she is offered the lead for one of Tinseltown’s most buzzy about-to-be-made films, Fifty Shades of Grey—the steamy best-selling novel currently on her nightstand— Williams said she would decline. "I wouldn’t take it. It is just too much for me but I applaud whatever actress steps up to the plate and I can’t wait to watch it."

The final explanation, posited by The Cut's Yael Kohen, is that the show was trying to disguise Williams' obvious weight loss. It comes amid concerns that Girls should still be believable now that its actresses look so ‘Hollywood’ this season. So much has been made of Dunham’s penchant for flaunting her less-than-perfect body on the HBO series she writes, directs, and stars in, that it’s been easy to overlook how the other girls of Girls bucked the repressive Hollywood standard of beauty too, he observes. During the first season, Girls co-stars Jemima Kirke and Allison Williams played what can, in TV parlance, be described as the hot and pretty friends, and indeed they were hot and pretty — but in a refreshingly normal way. That is to say, neither was particularly skinny that first season — certainly not Hollywood skinny. Trim, yes, but their bellies were noticeably soft, their hips curvy and faces full. Like so many of us, they’d look luscious in bikinis, like women who enjoyed brunch and weren’t cultish about spinning. And yet they were no less attractive or desirable: Kirke as the sexually adventurous, bohemian femme fatale with “a face like Brigitte Bardot and an ass like Rihanna,” so tempting she breaks up a marriage; and Williams as the uptight career gal with the classically patrician face and curves, who attracts a hot young artist at his own art show.

This realism was a departure from the standard template of a sexually desirable woman we’re used to seeing on TV and film in recent years: typically modelesque things with cut arms, a smooth hip line, and flat abs. Today, most sitcom actresses have the kind of fantasy figures that in real life require hours at the gym: Cheryl Hines as a hard-bodied cougar on Suburgatory, Krysten Ritter’s willowy vixen in Don’t Trust the B---- In Apartment 23, Sofia Vergara as an impossibly buoyant trophy wife in Modern Family. (Even Vergara's theoretically less-glamorous Modern Family foil is the astonishingly toned Julie Bowen.) There are exceptions, of course, among them Kat Dennings on Two Broke Girls and Mindy Kaling on The Mindy Project, but neither character spends much time unclothed or rolling around in the sack. That isn’t the case on Girls, where sexually explicit, skin-baring hookups are frequent and much like in life, having a stick-thin body is secondary to attitude and style.

It’s a testament to the show, then, that during the first episode of the second season, Dunham doesn’t let Williams get away with her real-life weight loss — she looks very Hollywood now — without comment. In a scene between Williams’s Marnie and her mother (played by Rita Wilson), her mother tells her that she looks "30 years old." "I miss the softness in your face," she tells her. "All you girls think that you look really good, but you just look like floats in the Macy’s parade — these big heads on these tiny bodies." And over the next few episodes, Marnie’s problems only seem to get worse as she starts to rely more on her looks than her smarts to make a living.

But it’s unsettling to see one of the most unseemly aspects of the entertainment business encroach upon the cast of Girls so quickly, and so visibly, if only because the show seemed such an aggressively defiant fuck-you to how women (and leading ladies) are expected to act and look on screen. While it’s never surprising when an actress loses weight once she lands a hit show — we’ve seen this play out time and again, from Valerie Harper on the Mary Tyler Moore Show to Jennifer Aniston on Friends — it’s a slippery slope when a popular series succumbs to Hollywood’s baser pressures. Think of how quickly Roseanne degenerated once she gussied up; or how Elaine Benes lost her Everygirl neuroses once she starting using product to smooth her frizzy hair. Authenticity matters when authenticity is a crucial part of the story line, which has been the case for Girls, a show that prides itself in getting the details right, down to the "gross underwear" real women find themselves wearing during "goofy," "awkward" sex scenes.

Since there is a different standard in movies than there is on the small screen, some of the thinning out that happens to TV stars is inevitable. Historically, television has been a presumed launch pad for a bigger career in movies. But for the cast of Girls, some of this pressure seems self-imposed. Kirke, who started shooting the series six weeks after giving birth, alluded to as much in an interview with Vulture last year: "I mean, I’ve considered [losing weight]. Obviously I’ve been like, 'Maybe? I’m on TV. Allison Williams is looking really skinny and Lena’s, like, lost a ton of weight, and Zosia’s always, like, tiny. Maybe I should.' And then I’m just like ‘I love eating with my family and I love eating Reese’s at night and watching American Idol.’ I can’t." But then Kirke, who was roped into the show by childhood friend Dunham, has also said that she does not want to be an actress long-term.

Attractive women have always had a place on television but the extreme hottiefication of comedy’s leading ladies only intensified when Friends debuted in 1994 with a cast of attractive twentysomethings portrayed in an aspirational light. Friends was a ratings blockbuster, and its ability to capture the elusive 18-to-49-year-old demographic that advertisers coveted made it a particularly lucrative cash cow. In an effort to re-create that magic, network executives greenlit a number of forgettable sitcoms with good-looking casts, and the drive for programs that feature young attractive cast members continues to this day. (Remember Brooke Shields as the suddenly single magazine writer on Suddenly Susan, or Lea Thompson as boyfriend-less cartoonist in Caroline in the City?) In the meantime, as the Friends stars grew more famous and opportunities to star in movies increased, so too did the pressure on its female cast members to look good.

During interviews for Kohen's book We Killed: the Rise of Women In American Comedy, Marta Kauffman, the co-creator of Friends, said, "I think that the pressure that women who are in the limelight feel is enormous, and looking a certain way becomes a priority for them. No one ever said to these women, you have to be skinny. But I think when you go into a dressing room twice a week and try on clothes that you are going to wear in front of the camera, and you have to walk a red carpet and your picture is constantly being taken, it’s going to become a priority.” And Lisa Kudrow concurred: “There’s still a pressure to be as attractive as you possibly can. And, you know, it’s not from outside, it’s inside too. They start feeding into each other. You see yourself on TV and it’s, like, 'Wow, I really should lose; I really should be ten pounds underweight if I can manage it.'"

In her memoir Bossypants, Tina Fey — who famously lost 30 pounds before getting her star turn as co-anchor on Saturday Night Live’s "Weekend Update" and now glams it up regularly on the red carpet and on the covers of glossies — argues that "we should leave people alone about their weight. Being skinny for a while (provided you actually eat food and don't take pills or smoke to get there) is a perfectly fine pasttime. Everyone should try it once, like a super-short haircut or dating a white guy." She gives us her “remembrances of being very, very skinny,” running three miles a day, six days a week and “lov[ing] it when people told me I was getting too thin.” It's clear that Fey doesn't put too much stock in Hollywood standards of beauty but she does play along. After her remembrances of being skinny, Fey offers remembrances of being “a little bit fat," yet another "natural phase of life and nothing to be ashamed of." It's a juxtaposition that also plays out on 30 Rock, as the objectively attractive Liz Lemon gets kicked around for being dowdy. The jokes are entirely out of character but as Fey got more famous and glamorized, some fans, fair or not, found it harder to take her self-deprecating slights.

Could the transformation of Girls from fleshy Williamsburg hipsters to glammed-out A-listers mark the beginning of the end, the moment when the rest of us stop believing that these girls echo, to paraphrase Hannah, the voices of their generation? Not that Dunham & Co. need to look schlubby, of course, but there is something particularly un-Everywoman about actresses we see on red carpets wearing Prada and Oscar de la Renta, as Dunham and Williams did to the Emmys last year. So far Dunham has managed to stay true to her mission and the first few episodes of the new season, which premieres Sunday on HBO, are fantastic. But it’s hard to imagine that once the magazine covers roll in, and then the movie offers, that we won’t soon see our girls get Simonized by the Hollywood machine. Now, with all the fanfare surrounding Girls' second season, Dunham and her co-stars are having their cake — let’s just hope they keep eating it, too.

Whatever the truth about the logisitcs of that very clumsy looking sex scene, Williams at least understood why, in a moment of weakness, the characters might try to sleep together. "There was an attraction ... just aesthetically. But I also think they both needed someone else to be attracted to them, for different reasons and it's in the conversation leading up to it," Williams said. "He says he feels weird about his relationship because his boyfriend pays for everything ... and Marnie's talking about Charlie and Audrey, and trying to throw that off like it's not a big deal, like she didn't just get wasted because of seeing them at a party together ... And then they there are, and he punches her in the boob and then that happens."

Rannells, an openly gay actor simultaneously playing gay roles on "Girls" and "The New Normal", initially approached the storyline with some trepidation. Reflecting on the fact that Elijah has now had sex with two of the four "Girls," he said, "It was not my personal experience coming out, I didn't do that, but I know a lot of folks who did. I asked some of my gay friends before I did it, 'Well, do you think this is realistic?' And they all said yes ... particularly at that age. I'm 34 -- I'm not going to get drunk and stick it in a girl right now. It's not gonna happen. But at 22 or 23, when you're still sorting out identity and all that bullshit, I think it's more of an option. You're like, 'Well, why not? Give it a shot.'"
Read more on this article...

Monday, 14 January 2013

Girls S02E01

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post. Read more on this article...

Saturday, 12 January 2013

Everyone Gets Naked

"I may be deflowered, but I’m not devalued..."

Back in April, as the first series of HBO’s hit dramedy Girls was being broadcast, a Photoshopped version of the show’s publicity poster broke out on the web like HPV on a college campus. The acclaimed series about four hip young women making their way in the world — or, at least, in Brooklyn — had already developed both a following and a backlash. In the remixed poster, its title had been changed to Nepotism, and the four lead actors’ names replaced with those of their parents: Bad Company drummer Simon Kirke (father of Jemima); NBC news anchor Brian Williams (father of Allison); artist Laurie Simmons (mother of Lena Dunham); and the playwright and film-maker David Mamet (father of Zosia). Zosia hasn’t seen the image, but when described to her, she laughs and reluctantly admits that it’s funny, kind of. "But it was a total coincidence that we all have well-known parents. We didn’t all know each other before the show. It wasn’t like we all decided that we had famous parents, 'So, hey, let’s do a show together!'"

Zosia has had two memorable roles in hit TV series in the past few years: first as Joyce, Peggy Olson’s sardonic lesbian pal in Mad Men; then as Shoshanna, the pink-wearing, NYU-attending, Sex and the City-watching Jewish American virgin in Girls. Both characters consort with New York hipsters at coffee houses and warehouse parties; the difference between them is half a century. In person, she has Joyce’s cool, without the character’s caustic edge, and Shoshanna’s sweetness, without the batshit-crazy element. Her role in Girls wasn’t intended to last beyond the pilot episode, but plans changed and Shoshanna became a recurring character; first glimpsed in her bedroom waving a smudge stick as she thanks "the higher powers for all the gifts I have already received: a keen mathematical mind and fairly fast-growing hair." It's a testament to Girls that a moment like this feels as authentic as it is funny.


The show itself, meanwhile, caught a wave of public attention — mostly positive, some not so much — and saw its creator and Zosia’s co-star Lena Dunham hailed as the voice of her disaffected, underemployed, self-obsessed generation. The characters' well-intentioned efforts at good times are often stressful and humiliating. (And sometimes cringe-inducing for viewers, for whom Girls, unlike most TV shows, serves as a graphic reminder that sex between young people can be shockingly un-sexy.) The brilliant thing about Lena’s writing, says Mamet, is that there are no touch-ups. "She writes as real as possible, and we’re shown in the most real, often unattractive light." On the subject of unattractive lighting, one of the most talked-about aspects of the show is its frank and frequent nudity. Dunham is naked on screen more than almost any TV star in memory — including the cast members of Game of Thrones — and even the uptight Shoshanna, who spends most of series one a virgin, had two awkward sex scenes in its first season, with more doubtless to come in the second. "I will pretty much do anything Lena Dunham asks me to," Zosia explains. "Our show operates with the utmost professionalism. We try to keep it as minimal as possible, as real as we can, but do what we need to to make us feel comfortable. We also have an incredible costume designer and a wonderful hair and make-up team. So once we know that one of us is going to be nude, it’s all prepared for very quickly: 'Do we need tanner?' 'What are the underwear options?”'"

Such information is offered up almost unthinkingly by Mamet these days, so often is she asked intrusive questions about those delicate scenes, which required what seemed like total nudity. "I had a nude cover on, which is basically a Band-Aid that sticks right here and ends right at the top of here," she reveals, pointing pretty much to where you would expect. Asked if she was naked running down the street in that crack-smoking episode, she says she wore underwear and pantyhose. "I’ve had people stop me on the street and be like, 'I have to know, were you naked?'"

Jemima Kirke, who plays the free-spirited Jessa, previously admitted such scenes can be mortifying, particularly because of the number of people watching. "It is worse shooting it at the time," she said. "Now I see it as one big performance; one effort as this package of girls. It doesn't embarrass me as much because it's all related and all part of something bigger. When I do it myself, on set, and I'm doing a real orgasm - not "real," but the way I know it sounds in real life, because I don't know how to fake it - I'm embarrassed in front of the cameraman. That's embarrassing. For some reason, when it's on TV, I'm proud of it as part of the work."

It is the reason Kirke wasn't too dismayed to discover her character was going to get her period while fooling around with that guy in the bathroom. "When I was reading it. I was like, "Girl shit. That's what happens to girls," she laughed. "But when you see it on TV, it's quite shocking. I got it as a good show, and I got maybe 80 percent of what Lena was trying to do, but then when I saw it, I understood. I've never read a script before so I read it and I don't have much frame of reference. I don't look at the script and, visually, I don't see it onscreen. I just read it and, to me, it's very standard. That's what happens to girls: Periods." Kirke does admit, though, she had problems with the more risque scenes for the upcoming season. "They're difficult when you're four months pregnant, your body is changing in ways that are not desirable, and you've got 30 men starring at you," she says. "It's actually like a nightmare!"

The final member of Dunham's posse, Allison Williams, has always insisted she does not intend to fully strip on screen, as Lena's character often does. But then, she also thinks the nudity on Girls differs from other shows or movies because of the way it's shot. "The fact there's no glossy lighting and there aren't candles burning," says Williams. "The funniest thing is there actually is a sex scene with Charlie and I in episode two of Season 1 where there are candles burning. It's the closest thing we have to one of those typical scenes in the show, and it's terrible. The whole point of the scene is that it's terrible. The sex and nudity are all supposed to remind you of the worst moments you've had sexually, or the most uncomfortable stories you've heard, and that's what people are reacting to. It's not the naked body. We see those our whole lives. The newness is in the way the nudity is depicted, floating in and out of an episode like it's nothing. It's not the big crescendo of a film or the centerpiece of the scene. It's just sort of an asterisk."

Implicit in her words is a feeling the sex scenes thus filmed could make her more comfortable with the idea of being naked in front of the camera. "It makes me feel like I'm part of a show that's aiming to portray a very real reckoning of what's going on," she concedes. "It wouldn't be the full picture if viewers weren't seeing the characters in in these private moments, and that's something we all signed up for at the beginning. And sometimes it means shooting a pretty challenging scene, but it's all for the good of the show. I trust Lena. We look at what she does and just follow."

Where that leads, when season two debuts this Sunday on HBO, is to everyone getting more naked. It’s no spoiler, reveals Paula Schwartz, to mention that Dunham now has a black boyfriend and the show opens with them having wild, noisy sex. In the nude (naturally), in coitus and dirty-talking her way through a metaphoric foreshadowing of her season two character arc between thrusts: "I wanted this so bad. Now I’m finally getting it. It’s about fucking time." There’s also an anal sex scene but less revealed about that the better.

Co-star Alex Karpovsky, as Ray, has a nude scene as well. "It's not tough," he says. "I've been nude in independent films and I've shown my junk, and once you do that... Lena does a great job creating a comfortable space for the actors. I've never had to wear the apparatus. I care, but it's mostly blankets over my tuchis and I'm kind of on top love-making. I hope Zosia was cool with it!" As Elijah, Andrew Rannells had a similar challenge. "I took that nudity waiver as a badge of honor," he explains. "I took a picture of it, I sent it to my friends. I didn’t even really read it. That’s the embarrassing part. I was so excited to sign it: 'I’ll show anything!'" As it turned out, there was one item of clothing to spare his embarrassment. "Yes, I did have to wear the cock sock," he smiles. "And for the women, it's really archaic, it's an adhesive patch. So Allison and I looked like weird Ken and Barbie dolls. She's gorgeous!" Williams adds: "There are things stuck to you, people telling you to kiss this way and that way. You just prepare by laughing." Rannells states he would have been offended if they had not asked him to be naked. "Everybody else gets to do it," he says. "Why can't I? I couldn't have asked for a better first sex scene partner. She was my first; I'll always remember her! She shared her shimmer body lotion with me, which made me feel very confident."

In addition, Rita Wilson- a new cast edition as Marnie’s sarcastic and body-obsessed mother- is having an affair with a caterer-waiter. While Peter Scolari, who plays Hannah’s father, has already had an hilarious shower sex scene where we saw a body part of his we never expected we’d see. When the 57 year-old-actor was asked if his character gets naked again, he answered he turns up in the back half of this second season in episodes 7 through 10 and yes clothes come off. "There’s another nudity scene that occurs for my character that’s pretty personal and a little unsettling that developed in the writing with Lena and executive producer Jenny Konner," he said, "so what happens for Dad in this season is very meaningful to me."

How so? "It’s a progression that I guess you could say of the state of psychic distress that is a hallmark of Girls we see in her Dad, and I was very taken, in all seriousness, taken with that writing and that direction that Lena and Jenny Konner brought to me. I feel like a lucky old dog to be able to be a part of this youthful, sexy show," he said. "I’ve never felt so not at work as I am at work making these episodes." When asked if it feels peculiar to do naked sex scenes at his age, Scolari replied: "With all due modesty put aside, I’ve never been healthier or more available to do work. I didn’t know that, but I’m much healthier at 57 than I was at 47 or 37, so not peculiar. I feel some great timing is at work in my life, and I’m not making the timing. I’m just around."
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

Stripping Away The Bullshit

Lena Dunham is clearly a fan of nudity, harboring a consistent attitude along the lines of "I’m naked, so what?" It should be a refreshing dismissal of entertainment’s constant oppression of real bodies in favor of svelt, flawless figures — an act that simply says, "This is a female body, too" and moves on. Instead Dunham’s nudity, which continues right from the start in Season 2 of HBO’s Girls, constantly twists peoples' brains into tiny pretzels of disbelief over the fact that (gasp!) a woman with a shape not found in the window of a Forever 21 dares to make us look at her unclothed figure. Thankfully, writes Kelsea Stahler, Dunham continues to strip away the bullshit.

Dunham addresses the unyieldingly popular topic yet again in her appearance on NBC’s Today on Tuesday, saying once and for all that’s it’s really not that big of a deal. "It’s not that brave to get naked if you’re not stressed about being naked," says Dunham after her co-star Alison Williams praises her for being "the bravest person [she] know[s]." The writer/director/actress’s reaction is a refreshing one in an increasingly body-image obsessed culture – a culture that allows such descriptions of Dunham’s naked body like the one that ran in the NY Post review of Girls’ second season premiere: "giant thighs, a sloppy backside and small breasts." It’s a wonder (and a damn sad shame) that descriptions like that still exist. Yet, in the top half of a review of Dunham’s work, we’re talking about her thighs and not one of the four jobs she performs on Girls (writer, director, producer, actress). And while the prevailing discussion should be about her creativity and her writing, for or against, it was and continues to be about her body.


But we’ve been here before. Long before she was wearing her birthday suit on HBO’s Girls, Dunham was filming scenes in the buff. In her 2010 film Tiny Furniture, Dunham is seen walking around in nothing but a short t-shirt, exposing her thighs and her bottom and later exposing it all with clips of her video “The Fountain” (in which she is nude in, well, a fountain). Even then, her proclivity for nudity aroused interest in critics and viewers alike. Some reviewers like Manohla Dargis of The New York Times directed attention to the use of nudity as expression, “This, she seems to say whenever she points the camera at herself, is me, a very real, very human body coming into being.” Others, however, can’t get past the fact that Dunham continues to bare it all.

When Dunham addressed fans during her New Yorker Festival discussion in October, she of course touched on the topic. "It completely sickens me what our culture is doing to women," she said. Dunham had recently worn an outfit that exposed her legs, from the top of her thighs down to her ankles and received rampant criticism for her 'no pants look.' "I didn’t go out without pants, I had shorts on… If Olivia Wilde had gone to a party with a big silky top and little shorts she might have been told her outfit was cute," she said. "What it was really: 'Why did you show us your thighs?'" And that’s the problem with descriptions like that from the Post, which called Dunham’s exposure of her 'sloppy backside' a 'boon for the out-of-shape and perhaps a giant economic loss for high-end gyms,' as if Dunham’s perfectly normal female form is some sort of expression of anti-establishmentarianism in a world of oppressive physical fitness. It’s as if average women of the world might see Dunham in the buff, throw out their gym memberships, and cry 'fuck it' in unison. But again, that’s not the point.

Dunham tries time and again to address the 'issue' calmly and with the assertion that it simply isn’t the ordeal it’s constantly made out to be. The woman ate cake naked on a toilet in an Emmys sketch – you’d think with that we could reach the limit of shock, move on, and stop feeling a sense of surprise every time Dunham takes her shirt off on television. Okay. You’ve got us: she doesn’t look like most naked actresses we see in any form of media. But for the love of all that’s normal, so what? There is no point in uttering a word about Dunham’s ongoing self-exposure if we’re going to make it the yin to the yang that is the Perfect Female Figure According to Hollywood and boil it down to terms that make it something other.
Read more on this article...
 

Copyright 2007 ID Media Inc, All Right Reserved. Crafted by Nurudin Jauhari