Showing posts with label Misc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Misc. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 March 2013

Lost Treasure Discovered

"I do NOT see anything attractive in the agonies and ecstasies of a pervert, especially in close-up in my sitting room..."
Possibly the earliest surviving British gay television drama, a powerful and compelling tale of intense emotions between soldiers serving in the American Civil War, has just been unearthed, reports the BFI. Broadcast live on 24 November 1959, in ITV’s Play of the Week slot, period drama South centres on exiled Polish officer Lt Jan Wicziewsky (Peter Wyngarde), staying on a wealthy family’s Deep South plantation prior to the outbreak of the American Civil War. As war clouds gather, Wicziewsky’s initial arrogance gives way to emotional disintegration when the arrival of Eric MacClure (Graydon Gould) forces him to face up to his darkest secret: his love for another man.

The lost treasure was directed by Mario Prizek, who died last year. He enjoyed an illustrious career with the CBC in Canada, was openly gay and championed equal rights. He worked on several television plays in the UK, directing Roger Livesey in Governor Wall and Maggie Smith in Penelope for Granada (both 1960); and also produced and directed an entry in the BBC’s Wednesday Play strand, First Love (1964). Large swathes of TV output from the 1950s and early 60s no longer exist, as it was often broadcast live and not recorded for posterity, or was later wiped. Prizek’s British work was among the casualties, but fortunately South is preserved in the BFI National Archive.


Film historian Stephen Bourne identifies South as the earliest surviving gay-themed British television drama. In 1957 the Wolfenden Report recommended that "homosexual behaviour between consenting adults in private should no longer be a criminal offence", but the law would not see concrete change for another decade. In 1959 the subject was still all but verboten on the small screen, though British cinema would take a leap of faith with Victim in 1961.

Wyngarde’s performance as the tortured Jan is extraordinary, by turns theatrical and reflective. Though producers were unable to mention homosexuality explicitly, the bravery involved in accepting such a role cannot be overstated. The wonderful supporting cast includes Hollywood veteran Bessie Love as a worldly Southern matriarch, and pioneering black British actor Johnny Sekka (South has much to say on race as well as sexuality).

Writing in 1959, a reporter for the Daily Sketch wrote: "I do NOT see anything attractive in the agonies and ecstasies of a pervert, especially in close-up in my sitting room. This is not prudishness. There are some indecencies in life that are best left covered up."

It will be available in BFI Mediatheques around the UK from April 2013.
Read more on this article...

Thursday, 14 February 2013

The HBO Treatment

In order to know virtue, we must first acquaint ourselves with vice...
Truth titillates the imagination far less than fiction, wrote the Marquis de Sade. Well, over at The Onion they think they have the perfect idea for a good HBO show and it comes courtesy of 18th-Century France...

I don't think I'm talking out of turn here when I say that, as far as historical eras are concerned, I am probably one of the richest and most exciting periods in Western history. That's not me bragging; it's just a generally accepted truth at this point. After all, not every century of a nation's past can boast successive international wars, a radical intellectual movement, and a bloody revolution, but I've got all of that and then some. In fact, one would be pretty hard-pressed to find a period more compelling and ripe for gripping drama than myself. Which is why, when you think about it, it's pretty crazy there hasn't been an HBO original series about me about by now. Something like 40,000 people were beheaded during me, for God's sake. Put that into a made-for-TV drama that weaves a rich tapestry of historical narrative with gritty tales of intrigue, murder, and sex, and I'm pretty much an untapped gold mine of programming, right?

I know, I know, everyone and their mother thinks they have a great idea for a cable television show, but stick with me on this one. Between sprawling aristocratic estates juxtaposed with sordid underworlds and political upheaval driven by ambitious but flawed political figures, I can deliver the full HBO package. You want elegant costumes? Check. Candelabras? Check. Beautiful women with moles? Check and check. I'm packed full of cool stuff. You could slot me in on, say, Sunday nights at nine and probably get a 2.5 Nielsen rating, easy. Look, here's the first episode: A prominent but crooked nobleman hires a cash-strapped young libertine to ruin the innocent daughter of a politically outspoken peasant against the backdrop of Robespierre's Reign of Terror. Boom. That took me five seconds.


I'm just going to free associate now on some of the things you could see in an HBO show about me: a boar hunt in the verdant French countryside, a corseted young woman riding in an ornate gilded carriage through crowded Parisian streets, a stately duke applying his powdered wig in the morning with the help of his trusted footman. Seriously, tell me when to stop, because I can do this all night. By the way, did I mention that I, 18th-century France, was a patriarchal society teeming with illegal brothels and prostitution? There's your gratuitous sex scenes for the first five episodes right there.

Cast-wise, off the top of my head, I'm thinking Gerard Depardieu would pretty much be a given for me. You could probably get Selma Blair to play a beautiful young prostitute with royal ties in my prerevolutionary years—she could pass for French, no problem. Marion Cotillard would obviously be a tough get for a series regular, but I'm sure she'd do a cameo or two as a duchess or something. Throw in a little Tom Wilkinson as a Girondin sympathizer and Jean Reno as a wily beggar with revolutionary leanings, and you've got yourself a series. I can already envision the cast posing on the cover of Rolling Stone, goofing around with a prop guillotine under a headline like, "Sacrebleu! It's a hit!" It's almost too perfect, really.

And I think HBO is the right home for me, too. I feel like the other pay cable networks would not be able nail the period detail stuff as well, and basic cable just feels sort of cheap in a way, which I was anything but. I like HBO's track record. Michael Lombardo has made some smart programming choices lately, and I think he'd be sympathetic to my appeal to a young female demographic. Women have always been entranced by my mix of visual opulence and high intrigue. I don't mean to generalize, but it's true.

Oh! Just thought of something amazing. Maybe they could do some kind of cool narrative maneuver wherein Napoleon Bonaparte is just a peripheral character quietly introduced halfway through the first season, but then as the political drama unfolds, he's deftly laced into a primary story arc, and we see how his life intersects with one of the lower-class characters. Might be good.

And also, all that Napolion stuff only started happening right at the end of me. Go back a ways and you'll find some wars with Austria and England, the reign of Louis XIV, an influx of immigrants inviting cultural fears of the unknown, and the Enlightenment, which shattered preconceptions about religion, science, and sex. That's more than enough material for a sharp TV writer—maybe one of the Deadwood guys, if possible—to set up character backgrounds and introduce themes that resonate with our current political and cultural landscape, like the rise of oppressive political leaders amid widespread social and economic decline.

Honestly, should I just pitch a treatment? Why not, right?
Read more on this article...

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

Faces Behind The Faces

"No no no no, like, a big, sweaty fireman carries you out of a burning building, lays you on the sidewalk and you think, 'yeah, okay, he’s gonna give me mouth-to-mouth', but instead he just starts choking the shit out of you, and the last sensation that you feel before you die is he is squeezing your throat so hard that a big, wet, blob of drool drips off his teeth and just, flurp, falls right onto your popped-out eyeball..." Luckily, when it comes to Archer, you no longer have to worry that your imaginary girlfriend, who looks like what you think Cheryl Tunt would in real life, is actually hideous. Matt Thompson recently passed along to Vulture "pictures of a ragtag group of friends of the show and fellow animators that they wanted to use as physical guideposts" when the ISIS gang was first designed. In order to get the wonderful range of physical expressiveness we see in each episode of Archer, the animation team took thousands of photos of real people who would serve as models for the two-dimensional characters. And there are some interesting stories about the faces behind the faces — and why the production team chose these models in lieu of the voice actors.

So now we know that Lana Kane, superspy and thorn in Archer’s side has the voice of Aisha Tyler and the body of wing-slinger Hooters girl, Kynyetta Lester. More importantly, the Judy Greer-voiced Cheryl Tunt, Malory’s secretary and psychotic heiress, is based on Siobhan Price, writer/producer of Adult Swim–sponsored promotions. Sploosh...


"Aisha Tyler is gorgeous, but she also is the busiest person I know," says Thompson. "She could not fit us into her schedule until June 2014. So we had to cast someone else. For [series creator] Adam Reed’s birthday a couple of years back, we went to a Monster Truck Rally because, why the hell not? Afterward, we went to Hooters to grab some wings, and our waitress Kynyetta was ... shapely. So we decided to do the office a favor and cast her as Lana’s body model. For illustration reference, we take pictures of the models doing stuff here every day; it’s all pretty normal. But then there are those days when beautiful women dress up in tight clothes. There are also those days when ripped guys take off their shirts to show their eight-packs, but I tend to focus on the former. Now you know the real reason why Lana seems to somehow lose her top at some point every season."





"Siobhan is friends with many people on our staff, having worked for Adult Swim in Atlanta," explains Thompson. "She is currently in production on a pilot she created for them, which is probably more exciting to her than being the face of a beautiful yet insane cartoon woman. Even if that woman is voiced by the equally beautiful and considerably less insane Judy Greer. Cheryl Tunt is a nut job in a lot of respects, but the one kink people mostly associate with her is her love of choke sex. And unfortunately it is this question that is most frequently posed to Siobhan: 'Cheryl likes autoerotic asphyxiation. How about you?' Again, this brings about feelings of guilt on our part. And for all of this trouble she was paid $1 by the production. More guilt."
Read more on this article...

Friday, 1 February 2013

Call The Gynaecologist

The vogue for period medical drama is continuing with the commission of a six-part ITV series set among gynaecologists working in London in the early 1960s, just before the introduction of the pill and the legalisation of abortion. The ITV drama, Breathless, has been co-created by Paul Unwin, one of the creators of BBC1 drama Casualty in the mid 1980s.

Made with the former Channel 4 and Channel 5 executive Peter Grimsdale, the as-yet-uncast drama will focus on five gynaecologists working in the NHS. It is also understood to have a thriller element as well as a strong social history thread, according to sources, and Unwin has confirmed on his website that he will write four of the scripts, direct episode one and storyline the series. A source told MediaGuardian: "There were some women working in this area and they will be in the series, but gynaecology was a mainly male world at this time. This was before the pill and the legalisation of abortion and the 1960s hit the country and it was a totally different world. It was also before Profumo and there was a lot of covering up going on within the establishment which at the time was relatively immune from scrutiny."


It is understood that ITV wants to start filming soon and the drama may air early next year. Breathless is likely to draw comparisons with the hit BBC1 drama Call the Midwife, which is also about health workers and set a decade earlier in London's East End. Critically lauded 1960s advertising drama Mad Men is also understood to have been an inspiration, although an ITV source said the show would be much more mainstream in its appeal.

Breathless is being made by ITV Studios in association with Unwin's So Far Productions. Unwin will executive produce with Kate Bartlett.
Read more on this article...

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Why TV Schedules Still Matter

A number of recent flagship TV dramas have been shown on odd days or late in the evening. Does it matter – or has technology freed us from the tyranny of the schedules? asks Maggie Brown. Television drama is the most expensive sort of programming, she notes, so you'd expect to see dramatic shows treated with respect and scheduled carefully – especially when commissioned by modestly funded channels such as BBC2 or Channel 4, where the genre is a treat, on ration. But increasingly we find ourselves flummoxed by what, to her, feel like erratic scheduling decisions.

Irritation began to soar seriously in August, when BBC2 launched Parade's End, an adaptation of Ford Madox Ford's first world war saga, which had Sunday night drama stamped all over it, on a Friday night at the end of August. This was followed by what was viewed as a more serious mistake, when Channel 4 launched Secret State, its long-awaited political thriller, on a weekday at 10 pm. It had a superb cast, headed by Gabriel Byrne, supported by Gina McKee, Charles Dance, and Stephen Dillane – and seemed clearly targeted at older, upmarket ABC1 viewers. People who – boring though this might sound – don't want to be still watching their favourite new drama at 11pm on a weeknight. There is some overlap, of course, but you could argue this is largely a different audience from fans of say, student comedy drama Fresh Meat – that in any case has a very different tone – which has been a triumph in that timeslot, or raucous entertainment on Friday nights.


We don't expect flagship dramas to be on at 10pm. And when it comes to Secret State, the audience for political drama tends to be watching news at 10pm, followed, perhaps, by Newsnight. Why didn't Channel 4 put it in the 9pm slot? Or show it on Sunday night, before the second series of Homeland? Whatever … Secret State never became a must-see drama: with consolidated viewing figures of around 1.7 million, it fell short of a respectable 2 million – struggling to find its audience from launch. Then came The Fear, in which gang violence meets mental illness, with a terrific performance by Peter Mullan. Again Channel 4 scheduled it at 10pm. This time the late start was justified by some scenes of extreme violence and its aftermath, as the 9pm watershed is supposed to mark the graduated start of adult viewing, rather than an abrupt waterfall. But the decision to schedule the four episodes Monday to Thursday in the first week of December killed off that audience too: the best live viewing figures were 873,000.

This form of scheduling, in which a drama is stripped across a week, should be used very sparingly. It can, at best, create a "drama event" out of a tense thriller, but more usually – as happened here – it proves very challenging for viewers who have a life beyond sitting on the sofa every evening. Not least in the runup to Christmas. This way, once you fall behind with a drama by missing one episode, there's no time to catch up before the next one and it's tempting to duck out. This was a shame: The Fear had an interesting plot about the effect of dementia on memory and behaviour. It tried, literally, to give some perspective on the issue by using a camera mounted on Mullan's head. It was a far cry from the over-65s' favourite drama of the year, Last Tango in Halifax – broadcast at 9pm with strong ratings – but The Fear was a brave drama.

Many people will question how much scheduling really matters. Now 10% or more of viewing is via catchup services, time-shifted viewing and +1 channels – Channel 4 also runs 4Seven – there is no need to be tied to a schedule. You could also accept that Parade's End did relatively well in its experimental slot. Yet positioning and due prominence within a linear schedule still matter. Despite being strong dramas, The Fear and Secret State were unnoticed – or at least unwatched – by too many.

Yesterday, E4 launched its much admired Mad Fat Diary at 10pm, last night we came to the latest drama that Channel 4 is showing in that slot: Utopia, made by the Spooks experts Kudos. Given Utopia's high bodycount, strong torture scene and appeal to young adults, 10pm could be seen as entirely appropriate. But it doesn't finish until 11.25pm, which is late for those viewers who need to get up in the morning. Channel 4's head of drama, Piers Wenger, has described Utopia as exactly the kind of quality original drama he wants the channel to support. But he is also ambitious to occupy the main 9pm slot, which is where the BBC and ITV tend to schedule their big dramas. For viewers in search of choice and an interesting mix, this will surely be welcome – clashes are largely catered for by +1 channels.
Read more on this article...

Saturday, 5 January 2013

Gunning It From Behind

Ruth Jones reveals her new series of Stella should come with a warning – as there’s so much sex in it. The Welsh actress writes and stars in the comedy drama, which returns for a second run. But anyone who thinks it’s a wholesome family-friendly show might be in for a shock. Ruth says: "Everybody enjoyed all the bedroom Olympics. So, for series two, we have got new characters, new direction and lots of sex as well — because we thought that would be the way forward. Yep, there is a lot of sex, which is great. Those scenes are easy to write because they’re good fun. You find yourself writing stage directions like, 'Karl is gunning it from behind'."

Jones, who created and starred in Gavin & Stacey with James Corden, returns to our screens with Stella on Sky1 on Friday at 9pm. She plays the single mum of three from the Welsh valleys who has a complicated lovelife — and an odd collection of family and friends. After cameo appearances from the likes of Corden, Gethin Jones and Neil Kinnock in series one, there are more famous faces to look out for this time round. Strictly star Russell Grant is the guest of honour invited to open the local tanning shop. Ex-Welsh rugby player Scott Quinnell gives the school team a masterclass and Ashley Banjo, from Diversity, is in Pontyberry for Got To Dance auditions. Dennis Pennis star Paul Kaye also joins as a wacky Dutch new-age therapist who starts a self-help workshop in the village.


Stella was well-received by viewers and critics and earned Ruth, who lives in Cardiff with her TV producer husband David Peet, a BAFTA nomination. But she admits she was nervous about going it alone and writing a new show after Gavin & Stacey’s huge success. Ruth reveals: "Of course, the pressure was huge. But the response has been nothing but positive and I’ve been absolutely thrilled with it. I’m certainly not somebody who goes, ‘Oh, I never read reviews’, because I can’t help it - I wish that I didn’t. When Stella first went out, because I don’t do Twitter and things like that, David kept an eye on what people were saying and I said, ‘Don’t tell me, I don’t want to know, because they’re going to hate it and I can’t bear it and I’ll be really upset’. And then at the end of the show he just smiled and said, ‘They like it’."

As well as a fling with her first love, Rob, Stella started a romance with dishy decorator Sean, who became her toyboy. But Ruth, who also starred in Fat Friends, The Street and Little Dorrit, admits she did take a bit of stick for casting herself such a hunky leading man. She says: "Someone said to me, ‘Isn’t it a bit indulgent you have Stella meet this gorgeous fella?’ But I said, ‘It’s the type of television show that wants to warm people’s cockles’. We all like a bit of cheering up. You want to see this woman, who is struggling to get by have a Cinderella moment — there’s nothing wrong with that."
Read more on this article...

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Penetrating Victoria

"Albert entered by Bushey, advanced through Maidenhead, penetrated Virginia Water and left Staines behind..."
So, Queen Victoria, that glum, ultra-moral, model matriarch of empire, was really a self-obsessed, sex-mad harpy who couldn’t wait to bustle her own "repulsive" children out of the royal presence so she could hurry back between the sheets for another round of rampant "how’s-yer-majesty" with her beloved Prince Albert. That, pretty much, was the headline message of the absorbingly revealing Queen Victoria’s Children (BBC Two), writes the Telegraph's Gerard O'Donovan. This opening broadside, of three, saw a phalanx of academics lining up to tell us that, however idyllic the portrait of domestic bliss purveyed to her adoring subjects, life was no picnic in Victoria’s royal household.

Rarely have so many scrubbed-up royal biographers been crammed into an hour of airtime; so many, that sometimes the competing clamour of expert opinion verged on repetition. We also heard, often startlingly directly from the pages of her own diaries, of Victoria’s unquenchable physical desire for Albert. How she saw children – nine of them – as the high price she had to pay for sexual bliss. How babies essentially revolted her, and that she resented every hour spent with them as it meant less alone-time for her with Albert. One contributor even suggested that Victoria refused to breastfeed her children because "she had that feeling that her breasts were for Albert, not for the children". But however much Victoria worshipped her priapic prince, she never lost sight of who wore the royal trousers and Albert struggled with his second-fiddle role. This lead to rows of Titanic proportions which left their home life "a hornet’s nest of hostilities".


All of which was utterly, curtain-twitchingly, fascinating. It is rare to get such a painfully intimate glimpse into any relationship, let alone a royal one. And many of the less headline-grabbing revelations were just as intriguing. Like Albert’s unusually hands-on approach to child rearing. And his grand plan to secure the monarchy’s position by appealing to the prejudices and family values of the burgeoning middle classes. Hence the circulation of so many loving family portraits, images of domestic harmony rather than imperial grandeur.

Aptly enough, Victoria’s children, as individuals, barely got a look-in last night. They remained vague, formless creatures, kept in the background here as in life, mere adjuncts to the grand romance of Victoria and Albert – which came to such a shattering end with his early death, aged 42, in 1861. "Here I sit lonely and desolate, who so need love and tenderness," she recorded in her diary at the time, This was the point at which Victoria’s domineering presence, her "almost insane" need to assert her authority over her children, and mould them – girls and boys –¬ in the image of her lost prince, came to the fore. The home life, far from being a sovereign example of domestic serenity, turns out to have been as lively as a Walford front room, with door-slamming tantrums and serious maternal deficit.
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

The Brutal Truth

Ripper Street, Line of Duty and Good Cop may pile on the gore, but we shouldn't be shocked – it's just a return to gruesome form for British TV, notes the Guardian's Ben Dowell. New BBC1 drama Ripper Street, which began on Sunday evening boldly reimagines late 1880's Whitechapel as a Wild West outlaw town coping with the aftermath of the Ripper slayings. Inspector Edmund Reid (Matthew Macfadyen) and his two mates (Jerome Flynn and Adam Rothenberg) are like the sheriff and two goodies combating a gruesome world where beatings, sexual attacks and murder come at the viewer suddenly and unexpectedly. Most of the female characters seemed to be either prostitutes or mutilated cadavers and, if that's not enough, last night's first episode ended with the apprehension of a killer making what was essentially a Victorian snuff movie.

Shocking stuff, especially for BBC1, you may think. And it may even be a sign of an ever more violent TV drama landscape in which earlier this month Ofcom took the BBC to task for the use of a 13-year-old actor in a torture scene in BBC2 drama Line of Duty ("Give it, give it, now hold his hand out and give me that fucking finger"). And did you see the brutal killing of Tom Hopper's character in the opening episode of Good Cop? "I found it hard going", admits Dowell. What are we to make of August's Ofcom research, gleefully reported in the Mail, that a third of TV viewers believe our screens have too much violence and swearing? Is British TV drama really getting more brutal and vicious? Or has it been ever thus? Dowell believes the latter – and here's why.


Imports are one thing, but in terms of homegrown drama, you could argue that perhaps the most horrific moment occurred a full 10 years ago when a new BBC1 spy drama exploded into life with the dunking of a woman's head in a fryer full of sizzling chip fat. That tasty scene from the first series of Spooks (it was Lisa Faulkner's administrative officer Helen Flynn, if you recall, who met this unpleasant end) has gone down in legend. Despite thousands of complaints and regulatory intervention, it announced a show that went on to be one of the most successful drama series in BBC history. Earlier this year, son of Spooks, the Melissa George private espionage drama series Hunted, featured a relentless bout of shootings, fights and other elaborate killings (including a murder by syringe in the eyeball). But somehow, compared with the deep fat fryer, it all seemed a bit tame and cartoon-like. And the series will not be returning to BBC1.

Other broadcasters do their bit too – C4's The Fear had its near-the-knuckle moments but ITV's bloodiest heyday has long gone. In truth, it has never really served up stronger meat than Wire in the Blood, which finished more than five years ago or Taggart, which started in 1983. Home-produced TV from the 1980s and 1990s was if anything, more violent than what we have now.

The BBC's controller of drama commissioning, Ben Stephenson, says that he has not been "shocked in a bad way" by anything he has seen on TV. Even the death of Tom Hopper's character was carefully thought out and edited he says – the aim was to maximise the emotional impact, and not simply shock for its own sake. "I think that conflict and correcting life's wrongs are at the heart of drama," he says. "Different dramas require different levels of violence." He says that the BBC never discusses how violent a drama should be. "It is always about the integrity of the storytelling and whether what is in the script underscores the emotion."

Indeed, of BBC1's five returning series from 2012 – The Paradise, Call the Midwife, Last Tango in Halifax, The Syndicate and Prisoners Wives – all are pretty mild and soft (and there's not a cop show in sight). So while it would be tempting to believe that our capacity to tolerate gory or grisly scenes has deepened over time, this just doesn't seem to be the case.

None of the top 10 most complained about programmes to Ofcom in 2012 were dramas (Big Brother was No 1). And when people do complain about dramatic violence it is quite often not when humans are on the receiving end. The most complained about moment in BBC2 thriller The Shadow Line (which had its moments) was the submersion of a cat in a barrel of water. In South Riding, the 2011 period drama, the CGI recreation of a horse falling off a cliff also drew one of the biggest complaint logs of the year. Perhaps the most shocking thing about our TV drama is what actually seems to shock people.
Read more on this article...

Monday, 31 December 2012

Carry On Censoring

"I'm making a mental note of all the equipment they've got"
As fans of the old Carry On films and Carry On Camping being a particular old favourite, the people over at Melon Farmers were shocked to discover recently that ITV has taken to deleting the old nude scene involving naturists being shown at a cinema at the beginning of the film. In the past they recall it was never censored even when it was shown early in the afternoon and well before the 9.00pm watershed; and it was never censored when we first saw Carry On Camping back in the 1970s. All of a sudden, in the last few months, ITV have decided to censor the nude scene. What a let down.

It appears that ITV have also cut the famous Barbara Windsor bra flying off scene too; something any child in the 70s could recall watching in their front room in the company of their parents. Who'd think, asks Melon Farmers, that in more enlightened times, when people are generally exposed to more nudity, ITV would actually become more prudish?





All of which is not to suggest that shocked censors were amused when the Carry On films were first released. Although they are generaly seen today as harmless slapstick comedies, newly revealed files show that the films, made mostly in the Sixties and Seventies, were considered too ribald for the tastes of the time – with censors demanding extensive cuts and prepared to give many of them X-certificates. Of the 1971 romp Carry On Henry, censors said: 'Every joke has a sexual meaning', and ordered 17 changes. In Carry On Cleo, they demanded the cutting of a shot where Mark Antony, played by Sid James, falls on top of Cleopatra, played by Amanda Barrie, 'so we don’t see him wriggling his legs'. Many of the scenes which ended up on the cutting-room floor were restored into the video versions of the films.

The censors’ concerns are revealed at the British Board of Film Classification, which has allowed access to its archives as part of celebrations to mark its centenary. Made at Pinewood Studios until 1978, the films established the careers of some of Britain's best-loved comedy actors, including Kenneth Williams, Barbara Windsor, Sid James and Hattie Jacques. Between 1958 and 1978, 29 Carry On films were produced. The saga started at a time when Britain finally emerged from the grey post-war gloom.
Read more on this article...

Sunday, 16 December 2012

The Year Of Big Bother

Data released by Ofcom has shown that Big Brother was the most complained about TV programme of 2012. The Channel Five show attracted 2,088 complaints, making it the most controversial programme of the year. More than half of these (1,139) were about contestant Conor McIntyre’s threatening remarks against fellow housemate, Deana Uppal. At one point he told other contestants he would "punch her in the face, just to knock her out" and also claimed he would sexually assault her with an epilator. In November, Ofcom ruled that Channel 5 had breached the Broadcasting Code by showing footage of McIntyre’s threatening language and behaviour.

The X Factor Results show attracted 1,488 complaints, making it the second most complained about television programme. The vast majority of these centred on the controversial exit of singer Carolynne Poole, after a producer was seen whispering in judge Louis Walsh’s ear. Viewers accused the ITV1 show’s producers of fixing the result, as Walsh initially appeared to save singer Poole before backing controversial contestant Ryan Clark. Ofcom did not uphold the audience's complaints.


In third place, attracting 811 complaints, was ITV's This Morning. During a live interview, presenter Phillip Schofield confronted the Prime Minister, David Cameron, with a list of alleged paedophiles associated with the Conservative party. ITV later had to pay £125,000 in damages and costs to Lord McAlpine, as an ‘unfortunate camera angle’ meant that his name was visible to viewers. Schofield was also disciplined by ITV. Ofcom have said that they are still investigating the incident.

Top 10 complained about shows to Ofcom (up to December 12)

1. Big Brother (2,088)

2. The X Factor Results (1,488)

3. This Morning (811)

4. True Stories: Gypsy Blood (509)

5. Live: The Silent Ascent (378)

6. Sky News (364)

7. The X Factor (305)

8. Islam: The Untold Story (293)

9. Citizen Khan (256)

10. Keith Lemon's LemonAid (246)

Total complaints across the year: 16,666

Read more on this article...

Friday, 14 December 2012

Don't Carve The Sausage!

This Morning has had hundreds of guests over the years — but not many of them have graced the famous sofa completely naked. Four naturists appeared on the ITV1 show today — with just some cleverly placed baubles and stickers to keep the show pre-watershed appropriate — and told hosts Ruth Langsford and Eamonn Holmes that there is nothing sexual about being a nudist and how they will be spending Christmas day in the buff.

Tim Higgs, 56, and his team from the Clover Spa in Birmingham joined the breakfast show's sofa to reveal their plans for a very naked festive season. To much guffawing from the seemingly tickled This Morning hosts, the naturists explained their decision - and told the nation it is 'liberating' to go without clothes at Christmas. Higgs, who opened the Clover Spa, a seven-bedroom retreat for naturists, in 2011, says he will be enjoying turkey with all the trimmings unclothed - along with guests who have booked to stay over the festive period.

Of course, the hosts couldn't resist asking the question on everyone's lips: what happens if one guest is attracted to another, and there is a 'physical reaction', as Langsford delicately puts it. "It doesn't happen," Higgs reassured his host. "There is fear, but it doesn't happen when it comes to it. You are fully exposed but it doesn't happen. Maybe one time in 10,000. But you can just go off and have a cold shower."

"At least you know what you're getting,' added Ruth helpfully.


Higgs was joined on the This Morning sofa by his hotel receptionist Vicki Hinks, guest Emma Stokes and Andrew Welch, who has been a naturist for over twenty years. Welch said: "Most people can't separate sex from nudity, that is not what it's about. Years of social conditioning have made people feel awkward and embarrassed about a naked body, and we all have one. We are having fun and frolicking around but not in that way it's just normal people not in their clothes." Thinking about it further, Stokes added: "There is nothing to hide behind in a naturist environment." It has allowed me to be happy and comfortable in my skin."

In reply to Holmes quizzing her on whether she felt vulnerable naked, Stokes declared: "Absolutely not," before saying that being a naturist has in fact helped her grow to love her body. "It all started a while ago when I went along with a friend to a convention and I decided that 'what was it about those people that they were so happy about their body and I hated mine so much?' So off I went back to university and started doing some research and from there I decided to give it a try myself. And it's the best thing that I ever did because it allowed me to finally be happy and comfortable in my skin."

Higgs, whose four children and wife prefer to live a clothed existence, says he loves to go naked, and will be holding four Christmas parties in the run up to the big day. "It is liberating," he said in an interview earlier this week with Closer magazine. "Everyone has lumps and bumps - clothes are a disguise." He stresses that his hotel is not a venue for swingers, but rather a place that offers visitors the freedom not to wear clothes. "As a naturist, you don't look at people's bodies in a sexual way, you just see the people." But as with all things, there are health and safety concerns surrounding the naked Christmas party. "I have to be careful of the sausages when I'm carving the turkey!" he laughs.

Higgs confirmed that while all the rooms at his nudist hotel have already been reserved for the big New Year's Eve party they are still taking bookings for the evening event.
Read more on this article...

Thursday, 13 December 2012

It Shouldn't Happen To A Casting Director #1

Nudity Required... Those are my two least favorite words on a breakdown! Casting any kind of nudity is always awkward and tricky. I once cast a film that required a female character to go topless. The actress we liked for the role agreed to the partial nudity but she wanted to use fake nipples so she didn’t "feel" naked. The producer agreed to it as long as she came in and showed us how they looked before she got to set. So she met the producer (male) and the casting directors (me and my casting partner, both female) in the casting office for approval.

She wore a prosthetic nipple on one breast and showed us the contrast to her natural nipple on the other. She even bounced around so we could see that it wouldn't fall off. I know what you guys are thinking, sounds like a really tough job, right? Well it is. Even the producer (a guy remember?) was uncomfortable. The only person who seemed comfortable with the whole thing, was the actress, who then peeled the fake nipple off and stuck it to the top of my glass desk like a suction cup. The prosthetic nipple looked exactly the same as the real one, so the producer okayed it for the shoot.


LESSON: It’s all fun and games until someone sticks a prosthetic nipple to your desk.

Seriously though, casting naked people is a tricky subject. Dear, dear actor and actress friends, please don’t take your clothes off for just anyone! Do your homework about the people you're auditioning for before you go in! I'm horrified when I hear stories about these things. I can’t believe they still happen in this day and age! If you don’t feel safe, DON’T DO IT!

When you first audition, you should not have to take your clothes off. If you're one of our top choices, we'll probably have you come back in so that we can make sure you don’t have any offensive tattoos or something like that, however, we will inform you well before you come in what is required of you. If it makes you uncomfortable, you can always pass on the project. Sometimes it’s just not worth it.

Think long and hard about nudity because those nude screenshots will haunt you for the rest of your life.


Michelle Levy casts movies, writes stuff and occasionally dances.
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

The Face That Launched A Thousand Dicks

"I saw Louise Brealey’s pubes last night. The play was good too..."


The war is over. Beyond the prison walls, Troy and its people burn. Inside the prison, the city's captive women await their fate. Stalking the antiseptic confines of its mother and baby unit is Hecuba, the fallen Trojan queen, still clinging to the privileges of rank, even as she and her daughter-in-law, Andromache, both treat the Chorus, a pregnant woman handcuffed to a bed, with arrogant disdain. Her grief at what has been before will soon be drowned out by the horror of what is to come, as the Greek lust for vengeance consumes everything - man, woman and baby - in its path. Caroline Bird’s updating of Euripides’ great anti-war play is Greek tragedy distilled to modern parable, an intimate, charged ninety minutes formed around a group of universally strong performances; notably Louise Brealey (Sherlock's pathologist of choice) pulling triple duty in three roles the original text delegated to three separate cast members.

Achieving such a feat is no small task, but each character is incredibly distinct from the others. Hecuba’s daughter Cassandra, driven mad by visions, appears here in red striped pyjamas, all relentless fury and febrile energy. Brealey conveys the madness as demented childishness. She scatters grapes, and tips the Chorus's bed at a slant so that her head is dangerously near the floor; delivering a rapid-fire speech about fire and violence, almost at a whisper. Andromache, mother of Hecuba’s doomed infant grandson and trophy widow of the city’s most decorated soldier, sees Brealey wheelchair bound but marked with a defiant maternal spirit that eventually reaches its limit. Finally, as Helen of Troy, the instigator of the entire situation, she is coiled sexuality, brazenly willing to shock her contemporaries through tactical nudity, and ultimately willing to do anything to survive.

A lengthy eyeful of Brealey fully nude in that last role establishes her as a temptress to remember, coos What's On Stage, her stark sexuality all the more poignant for the play's repeated discussion of rape. As the one who brought death upon both sides of the Trojan war, Helen is also a magnificent lightning-rod for the vitriol of the other characters, particularly Hecuba, who has lost everything because of the actions of her former favourite. Three women, three different ages and mindsets and depictions of femininity in thrall - the virgin, the mother, the whore - all broken in their own way and all ultimately doomed.


So, what’s worse than stripping in public? Well, doing it as you play the world’s most beautiful woman, says actress and journalist Brealey. In a recently published article the Trojan Women lead describes how taking off her clothes on the London stage has changed the way she feels about her body...

It’s October. It’s dusk. It’s the second week of rehearsals for The Trojan Women, a modern version of Euripides’ tragedy in which I’m greedily playing three different roles. I’m standing in a dirty office in the old BBC training building on Marylebone High Street. There are dirty blue carpets on the floor and dirty great fluorescent tubes on the ceiling. There are six other people here. They’re all dressed; I’m in a bath towel that I’m about to let fall to the floor. Nobody knows yet, but I’m not wearing any knickers.

Yesterday I did this scene topless but kept my leggings on. I’ve never had so much eye contact in my life. Today, I’ve resolved to go the whole hog. As I wait for my cue, I feel an utterly primal feeling of fear and wrongness that seems literally to be coming from between my legs. Christopher Haydon, our director, is expecting me to wait until we get into the theatre before I disrobe completely, but I know if I do it too many times with my pants on, I’ll never be able to take them off. I just want to get it over with.

The towel drops. I don’t look down. I put my knickers on backwards. Afterwards we joke that where Chris was sitting, right in the line of fire, will be where I tell my dad to sit when he comes to the show. ‘Hi Dad,’ I wave at the plastic chair, sick to my stomach. ‘Hi.’

On the way home I text my friend Matthew from Morecambe and tell him what I did with my day. He texts back: “It’ll never be this bad again.” I don’t believe him, even for a second. I don’t feel relieved; I don’t feel brave; I feel like a sparrow that’s banged its head on the patio doors. But it turns out he’s right.

“I saw @louisebrealey’s pubes last night. The play was good too,” tweeted a critic from What’s On Stage magazine the day after Trojan Women opened. Although none of them have so far felt the need to share the experience on social media, a lot of other people besides this charming man have also seen my pubic hair in the past two weeks. In fact, more people have seen my pubic hair in the past two weeks than in the previous two decades combined.

When I first read Caroline Bird’s fierce, funny script and saw the stage direction: ‘Helen drops her towel; she is in no hurry to get dressed’, I felt a bit ill and wondered if the scene would have the same impact without the nudity. But Helen of Troy’s towel is not just a towel; it’s a gauntlet. She drops it to embarrass her mortal enemy; to show that – although her life’s on the line – she’s not going down without a fight. Crucially her nakedness also lets the audience see how bold, how beautiful she feels. It’s not about pubic hair. It’s about power.

Still. The idea of standing naked anywhere in public scared the shit out of me. The idea of standing naked in my own bedroom in front of someone who wants to have sex with me scared the shit out of me. The idea of standing naked in a theatre the size of a corner shop, five feet from the audience, whilst pretending to be Helen of Troy, the most beautiful woman on the planet? That sounded like a very bad idea indeed.

“But you’re an actress!” said my best friend when I told her I was afraid. “Yes,” I said. “An actress, not a stripper.” I’ve been doing this for ten years and I’ve never even had to get down to my underwear. It’s not something you sign up for with your Equity card. (Although now I think about it, my bare buttocks were once pressed so hard against a very frosted glass door – in an awful thing with Martine McCutcheon – that the glass broke and my bum was, in both senses, cut.)

“But you’re slim!” she insisted. “You’ve nothing to worry about.” Ah. That old chestnut. Slim women don’t have insecurities about their bodies. Slim women don’t have cellulite or thread veins or knees that always seem to look grubby. Slim women aren’t allowed to be frightened about taking their clothes off in public. Because they are slim.

I have psoriasis. My belly and back sport red scaly patches, a bit like eczema. You can’t catch it. Loads of people have it. But it’s not pretty and it leaves a funny sort of leopard-print pattern on your skin when it deigns to go. From sixteen to eighteen I was covered in a crust from collarbone to calf. (It came back with a vengeance when I was homesick on my first telly job, a three-year contract with Casualty. The make-up artists on the show photographed it for their files. Desperate to leave, I went to see the man in charge and lifted up my top. I’m pretty sure that was the first time anyone had flashed him to get out of a job.)

Like thousands of other women – and thousands of men – I also have stretch marks. I grew four inches one summer holiday and the skin on my 13-year-old bottom neglected to keep pace. Ever since I’ve had white lines that circle the slopes of my thighs like terracettes. Normally I don’t give them a second thought. But normally I’m not naked in public.

In the BBC series Sherlock I play Molly Hooper, the awkward, besotted morgue mouse with the Christmas-present bow in her hair; not Irene Adler, the feline dominatrix with the slash of a red mouth and the flawless arse. (I almost got to stand in as Irene at the read-through for A Scandal In Belgravia; but on the big day Lara Pulver was free after all.) My point is that when you act on television, you’re obliged to think about how you look in objective terms. It saves time, and tears, because how they say you look is how they say you’re cast. So I learned very early on that I’m not “telly beautiful”. I’m “girl-next-door”. I’m “quirky”.

The theatre, though, is a different world. Actors pretend on stage, audiences pretend in their seats and, together, if everyone stops disbelieving hard enough for long enough, we might magic up something amazing. In the theatre I can be a nine year old on a swing; I can be a sex-mad teenager in platform heels; I can be from Sunderland.

In the theatre, the logic runs, I can be Helen of Troy, the most beautiful woman in the world. My 69-year-old friend George, not realising we were doing an update of a Greek tragedy, tried to help: “It’ll be fine, you’ll be wearing a mask.”

In the end it was fine. I realised playing Helen of Troy was impossible, like playing the idea of a woman. So I ditched the surname. In my head, I’m just plain Helen.



Horror films scare me witless but I absolutely love them. It’s the same story with acting: I find it frightening but the fear makes me feel; it makes me feel alive. And while you’re screaming your head off, you’re definitely not dead. The prospect of standing in front of people with nothing on and feeling great about it was alien, horrific, and completely intoxicating.

I really wanted to know what it felt like to be that woman. Not the psoriatic sixteen year old who looked in the mirror and saw The Singing Detective. Not the apple-cheeked student who spent all three years at university with a jumper tied round her waist to hide her bum (they were the dark days of high-waisted jeans). And not the actress who, last week, finally put two books on cellulite in the recycling. Not her. Not me.

Last night an elderly audience member asked me after the show if I thought I’d given away something precious by letting people see my body. I didn’t know how to answer her, but it made me think. The fact is, I’ve gained way more than I’ve lost. I stand there every night, totally naked, with people gawping or giggling or gasping and looking away, and I feel okay about it. I feel good about it. Some nights I even feel bold and beautiful. I do, however, feel a bit uneasy about how I got there.

Exposing myself to 75 strangers a night has made me think a lot about what psychologist Susie Orbach calls “body terror”, the chip in your brain that tells you your body isn’t good enough but if you buy this cream, eat this thing, do this exercise, you can look like Rhianna and you will be happy. The idea that to be beautiful you must have one specific body: poreless skin, endless legs, tits that would get stuck in a champagne glass.

I grew my underarm hair for the occasion because I wanted to be naked on my terms. Or it was something else to hide behind. Or I wanted to make a point, that you could be beautiful with hairy arm-pits. I don’t know, really. The thing is, women feel like we have a choice about shaving, but we don’t. Not really. It’s not any sort of real choice. It’s a choice between looking normal and making most potential lovers gag. All but one man I told was openly appalled. My ex said, ‘That’s disgusting, you’ll look like a Minotaur.’ He’s a funny man. I was nervous about it. Up to the last minute I wasn’t at all sure that I wasn’t going to shave it off in the secret shower behind the loo roll-holder in The Gate’s toilet on press night. But a weird thing happened: I started to like it. When you can see my pubic hair as well, it looks kind of great – like it matches. Like a hat and gloves. Like it’s meant to be there.

We all know the bleached, waxed, sprayed, toned, sliced, photo-shopped people we see every day aren’t real. It’s not how we are. It’s not how we’re meant to be. It’s rubbish. But it’s insidious rubbish. It’s hard not to want to look, well, better. And, as an actress, I’m part of the problem. Actors are illusionists. We feel like we have to be; we get work based on what we look like. I know which angle I look best at. It’s the angle I present to photographers. It’s the angle I’m presenting in the photo with this piece.

I don’t want the young women who look up to me because I’m a feminist and I’m in a TV show they love to feel like they somehow fall short. So I should have stood on stage as Helen of Troy, flaws and all, and thumbed my nose at body terror and body fascism. But I couldn’t; I just wasn’t brave enough.

I knew that to do it, I’d have to pull off the mother and father of all confidence tricks. I’d have to treat my psoriasis with steroids and hope they worked; I’d have to try and tone my thighs; and, if the lighting looked like a Tube train or a shop changing-room, I wouldn’t have stood a chance.

In the end it involved a lot of pluck, a little plucking, fourteen hours on a Pilates machine, a pink spotlight pointing at my breasts and actually pumping up the fitness ball my mum bought me one long-ago Christmas. (I opened the box. It came with a free exercise VHS.) In the minute and a half it takes to do a quick change from an distraught, weeping Andromache into La Belle Hélène, our stage manager Jess sluices body oil on my back in as non-erotic a fashion as possible while I smear make-up over my scars and cake on mascara.

It’s getting easier. I’m not sure if the audience can still see the lines on my legs and the leopard spots on my belly and the dimples on my bottom. But the more times I stand out there, the more normal it feels to be naked and not shy; the closer to Helen’s boldness I come; and the more it doesn’t matter if they can. Maybe at some point I’ll even look down.

At some point I should also probably tell my dad I get naked in this play. He’s coming tomorrow. ‘Hi, Dad, if you’re reading this. Hi. Don’t worry, I’ll tell you when to close your eyes.’

The rest of you, you take your chances.

The Gate Theatre, Inner London
From: Thursday, 8th November 2012
To: Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Read more on this article...

Friday, 30 November 2012

Sultan Of Swing

An erotically charged Turkish TV drama has been drawing increasingly hostile fire from some very powerful people, according to reports in the New York media. Magnificent Century, a sort of Ottoman-era Sex and the City set during the reign of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, is wildly popular in Turkey and across the Middle East. Yet one person who is decidedly not a fan is Turkey’s conservative prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is so incensed at the show’s steamy depiction of the heroic sultan that he has urged legal action against the series.

In the latest cultural battle to erupt in Turkey, the New York Times reports Mr. Erdogan last weekend slammed the lavish historical drama, which chronicles the palace and harem intrigue swirling around the sultan, including the rise of Hurrem, the slave who became his powerful wife. Suleiman ruled the Ottoman empire from 1520 to 1566 at the height of its glory and is revered as a valiant warrior and wise Kanuni, or Lawgiver.


Responding to criticism from the opposition that Turkey’s intervention in the region was undermining the country’s security, Mr. Erdogan baffled some observers by apparently conflating the critique of Turkey’s robust foreign policy with the portrayal of a debauched Suleiman on the show. Suleiman, he seemed to underline, had been a brave and adventurous conqueror. Critics "ask why are we dealing with the affairs of Iraq, Syria and Gaza," Mr. Erdogan said in a speech Sunday at the opening of an airport in western Turkey, according to Reuters. "They know our fathers and ancestors through ‘Magnificent Century,’ but we don’t know such a Suleiman. He spent 30 years on horseback, not in the palace, not what you see in that series."

He said that the director of the series and owner of the channel that broadcasts it had been warned, that judicial authorities had been alerted and that a judicial decision was expected. "Those who toy with these values should be taught a lesson within the premises of law," he said, according to The Hurriyet Daily News.

Cultural critics and political rivals railed against Mr. Erdogan, accusing him of cultural authoritarianism and censorship. Muharrem Ince, deputy chairman of the main opposition Republican People’s Party, accused Mr. Erdogan of behaving like a sultan, saying that he was jealous of the series’ popularity and determined to be the only sultan in the country. Mr. Erdogan, whose governing party has Islamic roots, has sought to embrace and rehabilitate the Ottoman Empire, a period of grandeur when the sultans claimed the spiritual leadership of the Muslim world before the empire’s ignominious decline by World War I.

Turkey’s culture and tourism ministry responded that popular Turkish soap operas were generating tens of millions of dollars in export income for Turkey and were widely watched across the region, expanding the exposure of the country. Magnificent Century attracts a third of the prime-time audience in Turkey and draws an audience of up to 150 million from Cairo to Kosovo, analysts said.

Even the sultan’s real heirs appeared more sanguine than Mr. Erdogan. Osman Selaheddin Osmanoglu, son of the last prince in the Ottoman Palace, told The Hurriyet Daily News that while he did not appreciate the lascivious portrayal of his ancestors, he wasn’t all that bothered as it was only a fictional work. "I am following the series," he said. "But I don’t take it seriously since it is only a soap opera."

The show is no stranger to controversy. After it was first broadcast in January last year, the Supreme Board of Radio and Television said it had received more than 70,000 complaints, and said that Show TV, the channel broadcasting the series, had wrongly exposed "the privacy of a historical person" and owed the public an apology.

Mr. Erdogan at the time called the program disrespectful and "an effort to show our history in a negative light to the younger generations." Dozens of egg-throwing protesters chanted 'God is great' outside the Show TV studios. Some viewers were irate because the series showed the Sultan drinking alcohol — banned in Islam — and womanizing with concubines in the harem. They also complained that the scriptwriters were engaging in dangerous and disrespectful historical revisionism.

Melis Behil, a film studies professor at Kadir Has University, said in an interview that the show, which has helped spur a cultural revival of the Ottoman Empire across the country, had been inspired by the success of historical dramas like ones about the Tudors and thus focused on the manners and personal lives of the characters as opposed to the traditional battlefield scenes of many Turkish epics. "The religious right are complaining that Suleiman was a great leader and all you are showing is his sex life and private parts," she said.
Read more on this article...

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Dressing Up The Naked Truth

The BBC have been plunged into new controversy after irate naturists accused the channel of "falsifying history" by putting clothes on the actors appearing in Andrew Marr's History of The World. British Naturism said that the people of Africa, Ancient Egypt, Australia and other areas of the world would have been naked during many of the periods of history depicted in the reconstructions. In what is claimed to be BBC censorship, they are shown wearing costumes of animal skin and cloth often dreamt up by the corporation, says the organisation.

According to today's Telegraph, the group is now complaining to parliament after the BBC admitted it had been 'obliged' to compromise accuracy to take into account 'sensitivities' of audiences. It described the move as another example of the "once proud bastion of journalistic integrity, sacrificing its reputation for commercial reasons".

Malcolm Boura, BN's Research and Liaison Officer, said the 'world audience' referred to is overseas broadcasters paying the BBC to use programmes. "We do not pay the BBC licence fee for the systematic falsification of history in the pursuit of profit," he stated. "We do not pay the licence fee to be fed falsehoods intended to appease a misguided minority. The BBC is encouraging attitudes known to result in widespread and often serious harm, mainly to children and young people. The objective evidence on that is crystal clear. It is inexcusable."


British Naturism (BN), with 10,500 members, is the UK's officially recognised naturist organisation. The group said that in the Exodus from Africa, Ancient Egypt, the Minoans, the Caribs, the Australian aborigines, and members of a contemporary South American tribe, the costumes were the product of the BBC censors, not history. Mr Boura said: "This series is not an isolated case, BBC programmes and the website often self censor to the point of dishonesty. Most of the censorship is hidden so without specialist knowledge few people realise what is being done. Whatever happened to the BBC's high ideals of education, journalistic integrity, and honesty? The BBC considers this conduct acceptable so we have written to the Culture Media and Sport Committee and we are pursuing this lack of honesty through to the BBC Trust as rapidly as possible."

In a response to the compliant, Paul Kettle from BBC Audience Services, said he was sorry about the 'compromises in accuracy' that the corporation felt 'obliged' to make in the production of dramatic reconstructions. "You are of course correct in pointing out that, in reality, natives in various scenes in the early part of the series would have been naked," he said. "But in making a series like this we have to take into account the sensitivities of the widest possible world audience."

A spokesman insisted it was no excuse. "The BBC has admitted to the systematic falsification of history for profit and for fear of upsetting anyone,” a statement read. "There are at least six falsifications in the few episodes of Andrew Marr's History of the World that we have reviewed. The facts are actually very clear, as the BBC concedes. The costumes in many of the re-enactments are either dubious or quite undeniably false."
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 27 November 2012

No Sex Here!

With its usual mix of prurient interest and compunctious self-loathing this morning's Daily Mail managed to garner an entire article from the fact that Lindsay Lohan 'keeps her clothes firmly on' as she plays a family friendly Elizabeth Taylor in Lifetime's recently screened TV movie Liz & Dick. "Viewers hoping to see Lindsay Lohan bare some flesh during steamy on-screen sex scenes in Liz & Dick had just a naked back to contend with," reports Julie Moult. "The troubled actress, who last year posed for Playboy, was coy in front of the cameras during her comeback role portraying Hollywood icon Elizabeth Taylor during her two decade love affair with Richard Burton. Despite spending plenty of airtime in the throws ['throes'] of passion, Lohan, 26, remained firmly beneath the sheets, presumably to keep TV broadcast regulators happy with the prime time slot. But the audience were treated to a shot of Lindsay's bare back as she lay on a bed after one love scene."

In a seemingly endless display of salacious screenshots, the newspaper provides a reproachful commentary of the film's more intimate scenes; "Bare back naked: Lindsay Lohan's turn as Elizabeth Taylor only showed a glimpse of naked flesh" reads the first. Followed by "Caught skinny dipping: Grant Bowler, as Richard Burton and Lohan appeared in a non-revealing naked pool scene" and then "Lovers entwined: The drama showed the couple in several love scenes, but none x rated; before going on to describe how "the couple were shown enjoying a steamy bath together during the two hour drama."


The TV movie, which has met with near universal critical opprobrium, spans their two decade famously on-off affair, beginning on the last day of Richard Burton's life as he lay dying of a brain haemorrhage on August 5th 1984 aged just 58. The couple narrate their story from a darkened film set as the great actor's mind drifts back to the first time he spotted Taylor one summer at a Hollywood pool party. He admits to being instantly smitten.

The pair next meet in Rome on the set of Cleopatra while Taylor was married to Eddie Fisher and Burton to his first wife Sybil Williams, the mother of his two sons. But, notes Moult, "things do not start well and the co-stars are at each other's throats - Taylor mocks his classical training while Burton calls her rude and dumpy. Burton's love of the booze is seen early on as he turns up on set with a terrible hangover and fumbling his lines which leads to the first of many furious spats.

'A love scene? With him?” shouts Taylor to an assistant. 'A love scene? With her?” Burton played by Grant Bowler says to his assistant. The duo sit on a bed moments before filming is due to start and Burton struggles to get into character asking for a moment before cameras start running. He turns to Taylor who appears disinterested and begs her to help him get into the role. 'Now I have to act that I am in love with you and that you are in love with me and that is not easy. Help me. Please.' With that, the pair begin to kiss to the embarrassment of the crew and a director who interrupts asking Burton to finish reading his lines first.

Already whispers are circulating on set about ladies' man Burton and his fiery co-star. From that moment of their first kiss, they do little to hide their desire for one another. Paparazzi catch them out together on the town in Rome which causes headaches for studio bosses trying to avert the scandal of an affair. As both their marriages dissolve, Burton forces Taylor to chose between her lover and her husband in a room full of people including Eddie. He demands to know: 'Who do you love Eddie or me?' Taylor answers 'You. I love you.' She runs outside in tears and chased by her mother who says: 'If I'm not mistaken you have just ended your fourth marriage. 'That might be a record for a 29 year-old.' Taylor responds: 'What am I to do? I love the man.'

But a blissful summer together ends abruptly when Burton's scorned wife attempts suicide and he rushes to her side. Devastated, Taylor knocks back pills with a bottle of vodka when he tells her their relationship must end for the sake of his two young sons. However, back on set for the final scene of Cleopatra he tells his former mistress: "My heart is broken and you have the smashed pieces.' Taylor travels to Switzerland to get over her heartbreak but Burton tracks her down and sends the first of a lifetime of letters.

It isn't long before they fall for each other again and conspire another film collaboration in The V.I.P.s, ousting Sophia Loren as the female lead. Once more the Welshman is torn between his wife and his lover leading to furious on-set and off-set rows with both drinking heavily. 'It's 8am and they are already drinking,' remarks a member of the production crew. Snubbed by London society because of their adultery, chased by paparazzi and criticised in the press, they head to New York. But the animosity follows them there and under pressure - and after a divorce from Fisher and Williams - they marry for the first time. Burton has stage success on Broadway but an Oscar evades him. Nominated seven times throughout his glittering career, he fails to win an Academy Award which causes friction when Taylor receives her second.

They win their next joint film roles when they are introduced to a movie executive producing Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf. To prove they can fight on demand they ad-lib a row. Taylor says: 'Why would anyone hire a vomiting vat of vodka like you?' Burton replies: 'At least when I vomit, I make mellifluous sounds unlike your little mouse-crap squeaks.'

After the success of the film, they head on vacation to Mexico where their business manager flies in to tell them they are broke thanks to their lavish lifestyle. In a bid to save money and escape the press they move onto a yacht in the Mediterranean. Despite their financial woes, Burton continues to shower his wife with the expensive jewelery she loves and even buys her a $1 million private jet. Meanwhile, the boozing continues.'I've ordered breakfast,' Taylor announces before two bloody marys are brought out to the deck.

As she reaches her fortieth birthday the actress begins to fear her career is on the skids and tragedy strikes when Richard loses his beloved brother Ifor. Six months later on the set of Blue Beard, Burton's drinking gets out of control and marks the beginning of the end of their marriage. They divorce in haste after 10 years in 1974. But less than a year later he proposes for a second time at her hospital bed after she suffers a cancer scare. The union was over in months and both go on to marry others - never forgetting their incredible bond. Burton continued to write to Taylor till the end. Years later on news of Burton's death, Elizabeth collapses in shock. She kept his love letters until the day she died. 'I know he really loved me,' she says.
Read more on this article...

Friday, 2 November 2012

Getting Dirty For Chocolate And Crisps

It's safe to say love scenes are not most actors' favourite part of the job. Getting naked with a relative stranger can be nerve-wracking enough so having a whole TV crew watching must make it extra hard. But Andrew Scott, best known to fans of Sherlock as consulting criminal Jim Moriarty, has a secret weapon for ensuring a solid performance – chocolate. In his latest TV project, ITV1 series The Town (airing early next month), Scott plays a young man returning to his home town after a decade away. There he rekindles a romance with his first love, played by Charlotte Riley – and the actor admitted things get a little steamy between the pair.


Speaking in the Radio Times, Scott admitted: "There is an element of roooomance – yes, there is. I do get my kit off. I do." What, everything? "Well, no, I don’t think the audience need to see that! I don’t think they’d want to see that. But there’s definitely a bit of that." Scott revealed that he and Riley gave themselves a reward for completing the scene in question: "I had a Double-Decker Duo and a packet of giant buttons after it. Charlotte had a packet of Monster Munch."


Picking up the thread, Riley explains we're first introduced to her character when Mark is trying to just kind of drink his way through something that has happened. happened. "He’s gone to the pub and then suddenly you just see her in the background and it’s kind of strange for him because you assume that he hasn’t been back to this town for years; he’s assumed she moved away, but his childhood sweetheart is just suddenly still there and still very much present and part of the town and his memories," she tells TV Choice. "So you just see a tiny glimpse of her out of the corner of his eye so to speak, and then she goes off and he runs after her and she disappears into the night. And then he goes round to her house hammered because she’s the only person he still feels he might have a connection with. She’s now married and has a child, but he doesn’t know this and turns up really drunk to try and talk to her. She’s not really in a place to be taking on his personal problems, but there’s still a spark between them. Of course there is, or there wouldn’t be a drama!"

So, when you watch that particular scene in question and see the passion in the two actors' eyes, just remember it's not each other they're lusting after – its chocolate and crisps.
Read more on this article...

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

The Naked Intervention

With her sense of humour and friendly smile, Sandra Bullock is normally described as America's Sweetheart. But, reports the Daily Mail, the actress dropped her 'sweet as pie persona' - and her clothes - as she turned nasty in a skit for the new series of late night talk show Chelsea Lately. In a comedy sequence at the beginning of Monday's show, the 'apparently naked' 48-year-old interrupted Chelsea Handler in the staff bathroom and proceeded to chide the TV host over her show.

The 37 year old Handler- also in the pixelated buff- was standing in the shower when she found herself face-to-face with the irate Blind Side actress. Oscar winner Bullock chided her: "You have a responsibility to be a respectable talk show host. This comes directly from Oprah's mouth to my ear, to my mouth, out of my mouth, into your ear, down your body, out your vagina, up my vagina and out my ass. The overall theme of this message is that you are a huge disappointment. Just because you're the only person on late-night television who has tiny little lady bits does not give you a free pass. You have a responsibility to be a role model to young girls... and you need to lay off the booze."


Bullock went on to slap Handler in the face, before adding: "Stop sleeping with your guests. That is why I've not done your show; I do not wanna sleep with you." Referring to her short romance with rapper 50 Cent last year, the host replied: "I don't sleep with that many any more - just some of the rappers." The actress then slapped Handler again, prompting the TV host to start urinating in the shower. Bullock continued: "You're urinating... We don't make pee pee in showers anymore. We make pee pee in the potty." Looking Chelsea's naked body up and down, Bullcok finished by saying: "All of this is disgusting. This is fucking sick. Bye," before storming out of the shower.

Later in the episode, Handler revealed she had opted to go fully naked while filming the sequence, while Bullock wore a nude thong and nipple pasties.
Read more on this article...

Friday, 31 August 2012

Great Milestones In Televised Nudity

As regular readers of this blog will be aware the Parents Television Council has recently released their annual report about the state of American television, and (spoiler alert) things are terrible. Que escandalo! In tribute to their glorious anti-nipple jihad, Nerve's Alex Heigl has taken a look back at some of the pioneers who made it possible for such debauchery to invade US prime-time...



1964: Gilligan's Island is cool with cleavage, less so with navels

The real battle on Gilligan's Island was fought in the hearts and loins of viewers and concerned Ginger and Mary Ann. But an equally vicious war waged behind the scenes over the amount of skin the pair could show. In the 1960s, the belly button was one of the prime battlegrounds of decency, and so despite Ginger's cleavage-baring outfits, she and Mary Ann were barred from showing their navels. Promo shots exist with navels bared, but on-air, there were a lot of high-waisted shorts and one-piece bathing suits on that extended three-hour tour.

1965: I Dream of Jeannie plugs Barbara Eden's belly button

The story of a meek, submissive genie and her dominant master, I Dream of Jeannie remains a perfect piece of candy-colored '60s camp. Of course, despite all the skin exposed by Barbara Eden's outfit, the show was still subject to the puritanical whims of the Powers That Be. For starters, the only reason censors were cool with the show intimating that the main characters lived together was because it was established that Jeannie slept in her bottle. (Like a good woman.) The pesky navel thing popped up again, too, but the show's creators took a more direct route than a high waistline: they filled Eden's navel with a flesh-colored cloth plug.

1966-67: Star Trek and the "Theiss Titillation Theory"

William Ware Theiss was the costume designer for the original run of Star Trek, and his censor-skirting costumes like the ones from "What Are Little Girls Made Of?" and "Who Mourns for Adonis?" inspired something called the "Theiss Titillation Theory." It states that "the degree to which a costume is considered sexy is directly proportional to how accident-prone it appears to be," and proves that sometimes when it comes to nudity, less is more.

1973: PBS aims to make plays less boring with breasts

PBS became the first network to intentionally reveal a woman's breasts and nipples with its serialized version of Bruce Jay Friedman's play Steambath. The series positions a steambath as the afterlife; future Hulk Bill Bixby as God; and Valerie Perrine as... the above lady. Perrine was shown from the side taking a shower, and the scene was so daring at the time that only a few PBS affiliates deigned to carry the show. Steambath ultimately ended up showing a few bare male buttocks as well, but it's Perrine's scene that remains a touchstone in TV nudity.

1976: Captains and the Kings fails to account for TV-set variances, with sexy results

Occasionally technical ineptitude yields... erotic results. Beverly D'Angelo (best known as Chevy Chase's wife in Vacation) made her debut as Miss Emmy in the NBC miniseries Captains and the Kings, and one of her love scenes involved a matte cut placed carefully just above her nipples. But the crew failed to account for variances in new television sets across the country, and so the morning after the scene premiered, they received a panicked call that one half of the country had seen more of D'Angelo than the other half. Surprisingly, there were few viewer complaints, though producer Jo Swerling Jr. recalls that NBC's Broadcast Standards warned them "not to cut it that close in the future."

1976: Live from New York, it's Jane Curtin's bra

On Weekend Update, Jane Curtin played the uptight foil to Dan Akyroyd's smarmy conservative, which was why she got such a shocked laugh when she ripped her top open during a debate over whether or not she was sexy enough to fill Chevy Chase's shoes as the Weekend Update anchor, exclaiming, "Get a load of these, Connie Chung!" (Never breaking from her trademark dry delivery.)

1987: Playtex uses real women (and, by extension, real breasts) in advertisements

Prior to 1987, mannequins were the only acceptable form upon which to drape bras in advertisements. Anything other than their cold, unfeeling flesh was naturally assumed to start riots. So you can imagine just how shocking it was when, in 1987, Playtex decided to run an ad that featured real live ladies wearing their products. They were only allowed to air the promo during daytime programming, when it was assumed fewer impressionable young minds would be watching.

1993-on: NYPD Blue shows buttocks, in flagrante and otherwise

NYPD Blue broke barriers to primetime nudity in its very first episode, and continued to do so repeatedly, to the point where it became a joke. That said, the show apparently inspired L. Trent Bozell to start the Parents Television Council, so maybe having a nagging, sanctimonious watchdog group is the price we paid for so much sweet, sweet Dennis Franz ass.

2002: C.S.I. allowed to show a breast, provided it's attached to a dead person

Perfectly illustrating our national hypocrisies over sex and violence, C.S.I.'s first episode with the "partial nudity" warning, "Slaves of Las Vegas," ran in 2002. The caveat? The nudity was of a woman's exposed breast — during her autopsy. I guess they did it to avoid getting "nipple and dimed" by the FCC. Yeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!

2004: Janet Jackson's totally not-planned wardrobe malfunction

It was the breast heard 'round the world. The areola of rock n' rolla. The... time when Janet Jackson's boob popped out. At the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show, Justin Timberlake was incongruously singing, "I'm gonna have you naked by the end of this song," and then he pulled open Jackson's Matrix-esque top to reveal a lovely... metal... pasty thing, instead of the tasteful red bra she no doubt meant to expose instead. The whole thing was famously chalked up to a "wardrobe malfunction," but it ushered in a new era of FCC pissiness, as well as a still-ongoing series of lawsuits.

2011-2012: Pixelated nudity is the new frontier of offense

The PTC has been able to claim a 6300% increase in full-frontal nudity on primetime television in the past year, largely thanks to the relatively new phenomenon of pixelating full-frontal nudity. Everyone from Howie Mandel (in America's Got Talent) to Krysten Ritter (in Don't Trust the B--- in Apartment 23) has been donning a flesh-colored bodysuit to fake-nude their way to ratings gold, and the PTC is pissed, claiming (probably rightly) that such tactics only draw more attention to the censored area. Proponents claim that it's as much a visual gag as the classic black bar, and shouldn't be considered indecent. Moral poison or just a cheap grab for ratings? Either way, it's working.
Read more on this article...

Friday, 24 August 2012

Cover Your Eyes!

Much like real parents, writes AV Club's Sean O'Neal, the Parents Television Council continues to walk into the nation's rec rooms and shriek upon discovering that bras are off, leading to an awkward, embarrassing-for-everyone lecture that's once again been conveyed in its annual report on TV nudity. In short, everyone is going to get pregnant and have to drop out of school and miss prom, because the last year has seen a shocking 6,300-percent rise in depictions of full-frontal nudity, an increase that is tantamount to the networks replacing all commercials with lusty, lingering close-ups of nipples and scrotums, basically.

According to the results of research analysis by the PTC, there were a total of 64 cases of people going au naturel on the five major networks - CBS, NBC, FOX, ABC, and the CW - in the 2011-12 season. The Daily Mail reports that figure stands in remarkable contrast to the single instance of full-frontal nudity over the same time period the year before. Perverts may argue that, in the realm of regular, society-destroying dirty boobies and dangly bits, there was only a 407-percent increase of incidents, bringing us only 407 percent closer to total moral decay, reasons O'Neal. But most troubling of all, the PTC insists— in a tone of voice that lets us know it loves us and this is for our own good— is the rise in usage of blurring or pixilation that "could be perceived to be a closer simulation of complete frontal nudity, given that the viewer is seeing all flesh tones," and which could influence impressionable young people to begin experimenting with sex and Photoshop.


The slow trend from Buck Rogers to 'buck naked' began in the '90s with shows like NYPD Blue, but has become old-hat for current titles like The Office, Two and a Half Men, The Bachelor, and Don't Trust the B ---- in Apartment 23, all cited in The PTC study. In all, the analysis recorded 76 incidents of 'full nudity' on 37 shows during the 2011-12 prime-time network lineup. During the prior season, or from 2010-11, PTC notched just 15 instances on 14 shows. The study, which tracked TV shows from September 1 to May 31, drew the distinction between full nudity and full-frontal nudity.


Indeed, in nearly all of the suspiciously specific number of "76 incidents of full nudity in 37 shows," the various sin-mounds were covered in hot, fleshy pixels, rather than the old-timey chastity belts of black bars that once prevented everyone from imagining what the human body looked like naked. As proof, notes O'Neil, the PTC has not only compiled this treasure trove of links to blurry naked people on the TV with all the non-naked stuff cut out—like a porn loop for those with a digital distortion fetish— it's also provided meticulous descriptions of many other incidents that you should now imagine being read aloud in your mother's voice, so that you'll never find anything sexy ever again.

The networks used various techniques to blur character's sex organs from the audience's view, the study showed. The numbers exclude any animated nudity or suggested full nudity in which a person is assumed to be nude on the top, but a portion of their body is blocked by a conveniently-placed table or sofa, for instance. However, the study did include scenes in which individuals are completely unclothed and only the sexual organ is blocked from the viewer.

The study focused on prime-time, broadcast television, including network specials, but excluding news and sports. Surprisingly, the study stated that almost 70 per cent of the scenes showing full nudity during the 2011–12 study period were on shows that aired before 9pm and as early as 7pm. In comparison, a half of the full nudity scenes recorded aired after 9pm the previous year.

Of the five major networks, NBC actors most often appeared in the buff, with the study recording 37 occurrences of its characters going nude during the 2011-'12 prime-time season. Second was ABC with 24 recorded instances, while CBS came in third with eight cases of full nudity. Fox and the CW brought up the rear, so to speak, with three and four instances, respectively.

And just in case you think pixilated butts and boobs are all anyone has to write alarmist press releases about, the PTC has also compiled this helpful show-by-show indecency guide, which will tell you exactly what's wrong with series like New Girl ("Sex is the show’s main problem, with many prolonged references to sex and anatomy"), Happy Endings ("Language includes 'ass,' 'slut,' 'bitch,' 'douche,' 'hell,' and 'skank'), and Community ("Foul language includes the words 'ass,' 'hell,' 'douche bag,' 'piss,' 'crap,' and 'damn'), and also tell you why none of this is "cool" like your friends say.

In an effort to stave off our "douche"-laden descent into moral turpitude, the PTC has asked that you write your congressperson and call on them to help combat the threat of blurred nudity, in between all that stuff about the economy and war. It's also instituted a new rule that everyone's hands have to be visible at all times in the TV room. And they better not be pixelated. By way of example, and in light of the findings, PTC president Tim Winter sent a letter to congressional members asking them to urge the Federal Communications Commission to move forward in clearing the backlog of 1.6 million unadjudicated indecency complaints. In their analysis, PTC also found trends towards more full-frontal nudity, full nudity at earlier hours of the evening, and a clear failure on the part of the TV networks to use their content ratings system to warn parents. The following are excerpts from PTC’s letter to congressional members:

"In 2006, Congress passed the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act in response to growing outrage from the American people over the broadcast networks’ abuse of the publicly-owned broadcast airwaves. Yet since that time, we have seen a concerted effort on the part of the networks to constantly push the outer limit of what may be considered appropriate for the broadcast medium.

"Contrary to what executives from NBC, ABC, and CBS told you in 2004 and 2005, and contrary to what attorneys for the networks recently argued before the Supreme Court, they are not acting in the public interest; they are aggressively pursuing a dangerous agenda to completely obliterate any remaining television taboos.

"During prime time hours across all broadcast networks, use of the bleeped or muted f-word increased from 11 instances in 2005 to 276 instances in 2010 – an increase of 2,409%... It’s not just the language that’s getting coarser. PTC research has found a staggering increase in the frequency and explicitness of pixelated nudity on the broadcast networks during primetime hours.

"The networks have made it abundantly clear they have no intention of respecting either the broadcast licenses they’ve been granted or the public in whose interest they are licensed to serve. Therefore the American people, whose values are being assaulted on a nightly basis, must insist that the Federal Communications Commission vigorously enforce broadcast decency laws, as mandated by the Congress and affirmed by the Supreme Court.

"We call on you to give the FCC your full support for decency enforcement; to urge the FCC to move forward with all due haste in clearing the backlog of 1.6 million unadjudicated indecency complaints; and to give the FCC the tools it needs to ensure enforcement actions are meaningful and appropriate… Because Our Children Are Watching."
Read more on this article...
 

Copyright 2007 ID Media Inc, All Right Reserved. Crafted by Nurudin Jauhari